Annals of vascular surgery · 2013
The value of routine flexible sigmoidoscopy within 48 hours after surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tøttrup Mikkel, Fedder Anette M, Jensen Reinhold H, Tøttrup Anders, Laustsen Jesper
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Left-sided colonic and rectal ischemia is commonly seen after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) and is associated with increased mortality. Earlier studies have shown that flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) may detect ischemia when performed postoperatively, and suggestions have been made that patients can be selected for FS based on clinical and biochemical parameters. We sought to perform FS in all patients surviving the first 24 hours after surgery for rAAA and to compare the findings of FS to clinical and biochemical parameters.
METHODS: All patients undergoing emergency surgery for rAAA and surviving the first 24 hours underwent FS to assess any degree of ischemia.
RESULTS: During the study period, 41 patients survived the first 24 hours after surgery. In 9 (22%) patients, some degree of colonic ischemia was found. Segmental necrosis was only shown in 5% at first FS. Patients with ischemia received more blood transfusions intraoperatively than those with normal findings at FS. They also had longer periods with mean blood pressure <60 mm Hg postoperatively, and lower arterial pH on the first postoperative day. Blood lactate levels did not differ between the groups. None of the parameters were sufficiently discriminative to be used for distinguishing between patients with and without ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Severe colonic ischemia was less common than previously reported. All cases of colonic ischemia were identified by early FS, but none of the clinical and biochemical parameters were sufficiently reliable to distinguish between patients with and without ischemia. It is suggested that all patients initially surviving surgery for rAAA should be offered FS to screen for colonic ischemia.
METHODS: All patients undergoing emergency surgery for rAAA and surviving the first 24 hours underwent FS to assess any degree of ischemia.
RESULTS: During the study period, 41 patients survived the first 24 hours after surgery. In 9 (22%) patients, some degree of colonic ischemia was found. Segmental necrosis was only shown in 5% at first FS. Patients with ischemia received more blood transfusions intraoperatively than those with normal findings at FS. They also had longer periods with mean blood pressure <60 mm Hg postoperatively, and lower arterial pH on the first postoperative day. Blood lactate levels did not differ between the groups. None of the parameters were sufficiently discriminative to be used for distinguishing between patients with and without ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Severe colonic ischemia was less common than previously reported. All cases of colonic ischemia were identified by early FS, but none of the clinical and biochemical parameters were sufficiently reliable to distinguish between patients with and without ischemia. It is suggested that all patients initially surviving surgery for rAAA should be offered FS to screen for colonic ischemia.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic RuptureBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationColitis, IschemicDenmarkDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSigmoidoscopySurvival RateTreatment Outcome