MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00483

Медицинская библиотека · Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2025

Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development and Feasibility Evaluation.

Gutierrez Maria F, Lorenz Heike, Schulze Peter

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Aiming to produce carbon-negative soda ash, chlor-alkali electrolysis, CO2 direct air capture, and sodium carbonate crystallization are combined in a so-called CODA process. In this study, four variants of the CODA process are developed and evaluated by means of modeling and simulation. Variations of the process design are related with the CO2 absorption technology, the crystallization strategy, and the possible byproducts of the process. The processes using a cross-flow packed absorber had a smaller CAPEX (between 195 and 209 USD/ton soda) than the process using a droplet absorber (337 USD/ton soda). When coupled with the cross-flow packed absorber, the two-step crystallization strategy had a smaller OPEX (150 USD/ton soda) than the one-step crystallization (175 USD/ton soda). The revenue of selling the process byproducts such as hydrogen, chlorine, and CO2 certificates was key to the profitability of the CODA process. The most promising CODA variant (cross-flow packed absorber and two-step crystallization) consumes about 0.15 tons of CO2 from the air and earned nearly 200 USD/ton soda ash, making CODA an attractive alternative that deserves to be scaled-up.

Для цитирования: Gutierrez Maria F, Lorenz Heike, Schulze Peter. Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development and Feasibility Evaluation.. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 2025. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00483.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.