m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The American surgeon · 1998

Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency?

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F, Klein S, Stamos M J

Аннотация

Advanced perforated appendicitis with localized findings has classically been treated with either operative therapy or with percutaneous drainage. The role of nonoperative therapy followed by interval appendectomy (IA) remains controversial. We assessed the safety and efficacy of conservative management for perforated appendicitis in a 5-year review of patients treated conservatively for perforated appendicitis with localized abscess or phlegmon. Patients were treated initially with intravenous antibiotics, and CT-guided drainage was used only if the patient failed to improve after 48 to 72 hours. Patients still not improving underwent appendectomy. Patients responding to conservative therapy were recommended IA in 6 to 12 weeks. Sixty-six patients with 54 abscesses and 10 phlegmons were treated. Fifty-one patients (92%) improved without surgery. Only 58 per cent of the abscesses required percutaneous drainage. The mean length of stay for conservative therapy was 7.6 days. Forty-one patients underwent IA with a 10 per cent morbidity and a mean length of stay of 1.4 days. Conservative management of appendicitis with localized perforation or phlegmon is safe and effective. Percutaneous drainage is frequently not required. IA is associated with low morbidity without prolonged hospitalization.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты