MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.10.006

Медицинская библиотека · Seminars in vascular surgery · 2021

A review of percutaneous deep vein arterialization for the treatment of nonreconstructable chronic limb threatening ischemia.

Clair Daniel, Gibbons Michael

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Peripheral arterial disease is estimated to affect more than 200 million people worldwide with some patients progressing to chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). Patients with CLTI have extremely high rates of amputation and associated increases in morbidity and mortality. There is a subset of patients with CLTI that have no available options for revascularization due to factors such as the absence of distal target vessels or adequate conduit for surgical revascularization. Percutaneous deep vein arterialization can be used in patients with nonreconstructable CLTI. In this review article, we discuss patient selection, methods, and techniques of deep vein arterialization. In addition, results from studies evaluating the use of percutaneous deep vein arterialization, such as the Alkmaar (The Netherlands), Leipzig (Germany), Paris (France), and Singapore (ALPS) multicenter center study and the prospective, multicenter, single-arm, early feasibility (PROMISE I) trial, are highlighted. These results have been encouraging with improved rates of limb salvage and wound healing reported, suggesting percutaneous deep vein arterialization may be beneficial in treating patients with CLTI.

Для цитирования: Clair Daniel, Gibbons Michael. A review of percutaneous deep vein arterialization for the treatment of nonreconstructable chronic limb threatening ischemia.. Seminars in vascular surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.10.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.