MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1534734608322608

Медицинская библиотека · The international journal of lower extremity wounds · 2008

Contact allergens in persons with leg ulcers: a Canadian study in contact sensitization.

Smart Victoria, Alavi Afsaneh, Coutts Pat, Fierheller Marjorie, Coelho Sunita, Linn Holness D, Sibbald R Gary

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Individuals with chronic leg ulcers often develop contact allergic reactions to topical preparations used to treat their wounds and the surrounding skin. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of positive patch test responses to common allergens in patients with leg ulcers or venous disease. A case series of 100 consecutive, consenting patients with chronic venous disease and other causes of leg ulcers that were available for patch testing were enrolled. The patients were tested with 38 common allergens, including those most relevant to leg ulcers. A total of 46% of the patients had at least 1 positive patch test response. Multiple reactions in the same patient were common. The most frequent groups of sensitizers were fragrances, lanolin, antibacterial agents, and rubber-related allergens. Though the prevalence of positive patch test reactions is high in this population, it is lower than commonly reported. This may be the result of clinical practice that considered the avoidance of common sensitizers in the management of patients with leg ulcers.

Для цитирования: Smart Victoria, Alavi Afsaneh, Coutts Pat, Fierheller Marjorie, Coelho Sunita, Linn Holness D, Sibbald R Gary. Contact allergens in persons with leg ulcers: a Canadian study in contact sensitization.. The international journal of lower extremity wounds. 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1534734608322608.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.