Медицинская библиотека · ESMO open · 2021

The lung immuno-oncology prognostic score (LIPS-3): a prognostic classification of patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab for PD-L1 ≥ 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Banna G L, Cortellini A, Cortinovis D L, Tiseo M, Aerts J G J V, Barbieri F, Giusti R, Bria E, Grossi F, Pizzutilo P, Berardi R, Morabito A, Genova C, Mazzoni F, Di Noia V, Signorelli D, Gelibter A, Macerelli M, Rastelli F, Chiari R, Rocco D, Gori S, De Tursi M, Di Marino P, Mansueto G, Zoratto F, Filetti M, Montrone M, Citarella F, Marco R, Cantini L, Nigro O, D'Argento E, Buti S, Minuti G, Landi L, Guaitoli G, Lo Russo G, De Toma A, Donisi C, Friedlaender A, De Giglio A, Metro G, Porzio G, Ficorella C, Addeo A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To stratify the prognosis of patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with first-line immunotherapy.

METHODS

Baseline clinical prognostic factors, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), PD-L1 tumour cell expression level, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and their combination were investigated by a retrospective analysis of 784 patients divided between statistically powered training (n = 201) and validation (n = 583) cohorts. Cut-offs were explored by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and a risk model built with validated independent factors by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

NLR < 4 was a significant prognostic factor in both cohorts (P < 0.001). It represented 53% of patients in the validation cohort, with 1-year overall survival (OS) of 76.6% versus 44.8% with NLR > 4, in the validation series. The addition of PD-L1 ≥ 80% (21% of patients) or LDH < 252 U/l (25%) to NLR < 4 did not result in better 1-year OS (of 72.6% and 74.1%, respectively, in the validation cohort). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2 [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.04], pretreatment steroids (P < 0.001, HR 1.67) and NLR < 4 (P < 0.001, HR 2.29) resulted in independent prognostic factors. A risk model with these three factors, namely, the lung immuno-oncology prognostic score (LIPS)-3, accurately stratified three OS risk-validated categories of patients: favourable (0 risk factors, 40%, 1-year OS of 78.2% in the whole series), intermediate (1 or 2 risk factors, 54%, 1-year OS 53.8%) and poor (>2 risk factors, 5%, 1-year OS 10.7%) prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We advocate the use of LIPS-3 as an easy-to-assess and inexpensive adjuvant prognostic tool for patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% aNSCLC.

Для цитирования: Banna G L, Cortellini A, Cortinovis D L, Tiseo M, Aerts J G J V, Barbieri F, Giusti R, Bria E, Grossi F, Pizzutilo P, Berardi R, Morabito A, Genova C, Mazzoni F, Di Noia V, Signorelli D, Gelibter A, Macerelli M, Rastelli F, Chiari R, Rocco D, Gori S, De Tursi M, Di Marino P, Mansueto G, Zoratto F, Filetti M, Montrone M, Citarella F, Marco R, Cantini L, Nigro O, D'Argento E, Buti S, Minuti G, Landi L, Guaitoli G, Lo Russo G, De Toma A, Donisi C, Friedlaender A, De Giglio A, Metro G, Porzio G, Ficorella C, Addeo A. The lung immuno-oncology prognostic score (LIPS-3): a prognostic classification of patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab for PD-L1 ≥ 50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.. ESMO open. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100078.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized B7-H1 Antigen Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Humans Lung Lung Neoplasms Prognosis Retrospective Studies

Подготовка и перевод публикации

Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление

Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.