The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception · 2018
Use of etonogestrel implant beyond approved duration: prolonged contraceptive effectiveness.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ribeiro Bárbara C, Nogueira-Silva Cristina, Afonso Hermínia, Silva Pedro O, Reis Isabel D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The subdermal etonogestrel contraceptive implant has a current approved duration of 3 years. There is, however, recent and strong evidence of its effectiveness for 2 additional years during which no pregnancies were documented.
CASE: We report a case of a 28-year-old woman who had an etonogestrel implant inserted 4 years earlier and wished to get pregnant. The implant was, however, deep in the triceps muscle and could not easily be removed. Her serum levels of etonogestrel remained positive even 6 years after insertion. As infertility investigation revealed endometriosis and bilateral tubal obstruction she was referred for assisted reproduction. Despite obtaining oocytes during an ovarian stimulation cycle, the endometrium was never above 4 mm, precluding embryo transfer. It was decided to remove the implant in order to improve endometrial conditions, after which the patient achieved pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: This case report suggests that the etonogestrel implant is effective for even longer than the most recent studies have shown.
CASE: We report a case of a 28-year-old woman who had an etonogestrel implant inserted 4 years earlier and wished to get pregnant. The implant was, however, deep in the triceps muscle and could not easily be removed. Her serum levels of etonogestrel remained positive even 6 years after insertion. As infertility investigation revealed endometriosis and bilateral tubal obstruction she was referred for assisted reproduction. Despite obtaining oocytes during an ovarian stimulation cycle, the endometrium was never above 4 mm, precluding embryo transfer. It was decided to remove the implant in order to improve endometrial conditions, after which the patient achieved pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: This case report suggests that the etonogestrel implant is effective for even longer than the most recent studies have shown.