MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.008

Медицинская библиотека · Heart rhythm · 2011

Ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly: results from the German Ablation Registry.

Hoffmann Boris A, Brachmann Johannes, Andresen Dietrich, Eckardt Lars, Hoffmann Ellen, Kuck Karl-Heinz, Schumacher Burghard, Spitzer Stefan G, Schirdewahn Petra, Tebbenjohanns Jürgen, Horack Martin, Senges Jochen, Salukhe Tushar V, Rostock Thomas, Willems Stephan

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) is considered the treatment of choice for patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, there is a tendency to avoid CA in the elderly because of a presumed increased risk of periprocedural atrioventricular (AV) nodal block.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this prospective registry was to assess age-related differences in the efficacy and safety of CA within a large population with AVNRT.

METHODS

A total of 3,234 consecutive patients from 48 German trial centers who underwent CA of AVNRT between March 2007 and May 2010 were enrolled in this study. The cohort was divided into three age groups: <50 years (group 1, n = 1,268 [39.2%]; median age = 40 [30.0-45.0] years, 74.1% women), 50-75 years old (group 2, n = 1,707 [52.8%]; 63.0 [58.0-69.0] years, 63.0% women), and > 75 years old (group 3, n = 259 [8.0%]; 79.0 [77.0-82.0] years, 50.6% women).

RESULTS

CA was performed with radiofrequency current (RFC) in 97.7% and cryoablation technology in 2.3% of all cases. No differences were observed among the three groups with regard to primary CA success rate (98.7% vs. 98.8 % vs. 98.5%; P = .92) and overall procedure duration (75.0 minutes [50.0-105.0]; P = .93). Hemodynamically stable pericardial effusion occurred in five group 2 (0.3%) and two group 3 (0.8%) patients but in none of the group 1 (P <.05) patients. Complete AV block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation occurred in two patients in group 1 (0.2%) and six patients in group 2 (0.4%) but none in group 3 (P = 0.41). During a median follow-up period of 511.5 days (396.0-771.0), AVNRT recurrence occurred in 5.7% of all patients. Patients >75 years (group 3) had a significantly longer hospital stay (3.0 days [2.0-5.0]) compared with group 1 (2.0 days [1.0-2.0]) or group 2 (2.0 days [1.0-3.0]) patients (P <.0001).

CONCLUSION

CA of AVNRT is highly effective and safe and does not pose an increased risk for complete AV block in patients over 75 years of age, despite a higher prevalence of structural heart disease. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is often ineffective in this age group; thus, CA for AVNRT should be considered the preferred treatment even in elderly patients.

Для цитирования: Hoffmann Boris A, Brachmann Johannes, Andresen Dietrich, Eckardt Lars, Hoffmann Ellen, Kuck Karl-Heinz, Schumacher Burghard, Spitzer Stefan G, Schirdewahn Petra, Tebbenjohanns Jürgen, Horack Martin, Senges Jochen, Salukhe Tushar V, Rostock Thomas, Willems Stephan. Ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly: results from the German Ablation Registry.. Heart rhythm. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.