Hand therapy · 2026
Intra-rater reliability of grip strength measurements in severely restricted hands.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Uğurlu Ümit
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Grip strength (GS) is a crucial indicator of hand function; however, its reliable assessment in individuals with severe hand dysfunction remains a clinical challenge. This study evaluated the intra-rater reliability of GS and grip pressure (GP) using the Jamar dynamometer and a modified sphygmomanometer (ModSp) in patients with complex bilateral hand dysfunction. Secondary objectives included determining the correlation between the instruments and exploring patient preferences.
METHOD: Fifty-two individuals with severe bilateral hand dysfunction due to systemic sclerosis were assessed as a representative model. A standardized measurement protocol was followed for both instruments. Intra-rater reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and linear regression was used to derive conversion formulas. Patient preferences were recorded using standardized open-ended questions and analyzed via thematic content analysis.
RESULTS: Both instruments demonstrated excellent ICCs (0.96-0.98). Strong positive correlations were found between instrument scores (r = 0.88-0.91, p < 0.001), and regression models explained 78-82% of the variance. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed systematic bias and relatively wide limits of agreement, indicating the methods are not interchangeable. Regarding preferences, 69.2% of participants favored the ModSp, citing greater comfort, better adaptation to deformities, and reduced pain during grasp, while 17.3% preferred the Jamar dynamometer and 13.5% reported no preference.
CONCLUSION: The Jamar and ModSp devices demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability for grip assessment in severe hand dysfunction. While strongly correlated, they are not directly interchangeable for precise monitoring. The ModSp offers a practical, patient-centered alternative when standard dynamometry is hindered by physical constraints.
METHOD: Fifty-two individuals with severe bilateral hand dysfunction due to systemic sclerosis were assessed as a representative model. A standardized measurement protocol was followed for both instruments. Intra-rater reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and linear regression was used to derive conversion formulas. Patient preferences were recorded using standardized open-ended questions and analyzed via thematic content analysis.
RESULTS: Both instruments demonstrated excellent ICCs (0.96-0.98). Strong positive correlations were found between instrument scores (r = 0.88-0.91, p < 0.001), and regression models explained 78-82% of the variance. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed systematic bias and relatively wide limits of agreement, indicating the methods are not interchangeable. Regarding preferences, 69.2% of participants favored the ModSp, citing greater comfort, better adaptation to deformities, and reduced pain during grasp, while 17.3% preferred the Jamar dynamometer and 13.5% reported no preference.
CONCLUSION: The Jamar and ModSp devices demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability for grip assessment in severe hand dysfunction. While strongly correlated, they are not directly interchangeable for precise monitoring. The ModSp offers a practical, patient-centered alternative when standard dynamometry is hindered by physical constraints.