MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-12-0231

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2012

Combination evaluation of preoperative risk indices predicts requirement of biventricular assist device.

Shiga Taro, Kinugawa Koichiro, Imamura Teruhiko, Kato Naoko, Endo Miyoko, Inaba Toshiro, Maki Hisataka, Hatano Masaru, Yao Atsushi, Nishimura Takashi, Hirata Yasunobu, Kyo Shunei, Ono Minoru, Nagai Ryozo

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients with biventricular assist device (BiVAD) placement have a poor prognosis, but preoperative risk factors for the necessity of BiVAD have not been fully elucidated.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

Data from 79 patients who received left ventricular assist device (LVAD) between November 2002 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Overall, 9 patients (11.4%) required BiVAD, and the survival rate of BiVAD patients was significantly lower than that of LVAD patients (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis for BiVAD requirement showed left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd) ≤62 mm (odds ratio [OR], 10.97; P=0.009) to be significantly associated with BiVAD requirement. Preoperative central venous pressure (CVP)/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ratio ≥0.5 (OR, 13.09; P=0.028) was also significantly associated with BiVAD requirement. A new scoring system for predicting BiVAD requirement was created from the combination of CVP/PCWP ratio (≥0.5), body surface area (≤1.4 m(2)), preoperative continuous hemodiafiltration use, B-type natriuretic peptide (≥1,200 pg/ml) and LVDd (≤62 mm), and this had a significantly larger area under the curve (0.909; P=0.003) than right ventricular stroke work index on receiver operating characteristic analysis. A score >20 using the new scoring method indicated significantly high probability of BiVAD requirement (OR, 16.00; P=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The new scoring method, which includes CVP/PCWP ratio, is a novel risk stratification tool for BiVAD therapy.

Для цитирования: Shiga Taro, Kinugawa Koichiro, Imamura Teruhiko, Kato Naoko, Endo Miyoko, Inaba Toshiro, Maki Hisataka, Hatano Masaru, Yao Atsushi, Nishimura Takashi, Hirata Yasunobu, Kyo Shunei, Ono Minoru, Nagai Ryozo. Combination evaluation of preoperative risk indices predicts requirement of biventricular assist device.. Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2012. DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-0231.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.