The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2012
Ranolazine-induced severe bladder hypotonia.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Panfili Marco, Iafrate Massimo, Marzot Filippo, Secco Silvia, De Rosa Giovanni, Groppa Francesca, Padrini Roberto
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of acute urinary retention due to bladder hypotonia during ranolazine treatment.
CASE SUMMARY: An 81-year-old male with multiple cardiovascular diseases was hospitalized for worsening angina and heart failure symptoms. Ranolazine 375 mg twice daily was started, in addition to ongoing therapy (clopidogrel 75 mg once daily, diltiazem 60 mg 3 times daily, isosorbide mononitrate 40 mg 3 times daily, carvedilol 6.25 mg twice daily, rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily, enoxaparin 5000 IU once daily, pentoxifylline 600 mg twice daily, pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily, enalapril 20 mg twice daily, furosemide 150 mg once daily, and spironolactone 37 mg once daily). Two months later, the ranolazine dose was increased to 500 mg twice daily; shortly thereafter, acute urinary retention occurred and persisted despite institution of α-lytic (alfuzosin) and antiandrogenic (dutasteride) therapy. A urodynamic study revealed that urinary retention was caused by severe hypocontractility of the detrusor muscle. Ranolazine was withdrawn and, within 2 days, the patient recovered his ability to void spontaneously; a second urodynamic study confirmed that detrusor contractility was substantially improved. Drug rechallenge was not performed due to the patient's clinical condition. Nevertheless, a phenotyping test to assess the activity of the cytochrome isoenzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 (responsible for ranolazine metabolism) was performed, with dextromethorphan used as the probe drug. The urinary metabolic ratios indicated relatively low activity for CYP3A4 and intermediate activity for CYP2D6.
DISCUSSION: The causal role of ranolazine in our case of bladder hypotonia is probable according to the Naranjo criteria. The mechanism of bladder dysfunction is tentatively ascribed to blockage of late sodium current in smooth muscle cells. Although drug plasma concentrations were not measured, they were probably elevated, since the metabolic activity of CYP3A4 was at the lower end of the reference range. Enzyme inhibition produced by diltiazem may have contributed to decreasing CYP3A4 activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute urinary retention in elderly men taking ranolazine may be due to drug-induced bladder hypotonia.
CASE SUMMARY: An 81-year-old male with multiple cardiovascular diseases was hospitalized for worsening angina and heart failure symptoms. Ranolazine 375 mg twice daily was started, in addition to ongoing therapy (clopidogrel 75 mg once daily, diltiazem 60 mg 3 times daily, isosorbide mononitrate 40 mg 3 times daily, carvedilol 6.25 mg twice daily, rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily, enoxaparin 5000 IU once daily, pentoxifylline 600 mg twice daily, pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily, enalapril 20 mg twice daily, furosemide 150 mg once daily, and spironolactone 37 mg once daily). Two months later, the ranolazine dose was increased to 500 mg twice daily; shortly thereafter, acute urinary retention occurred and persisted despite institution of α-lytic (alfuzosin) and antiandrogenic (dutasteride) therapy. A urodynamic study revealed that urinary retention was caused by severe hypocontractility of the detrusor muscle. Ranolazine was withdrawn and, within 2 days, the patient recovered his ability to void spontaneously; a second urodynamic study confirmed that detrusor contractility was substantially improved. Drug rechallenge was not performed due to the patient's clinical condition. Nevertheless, a phenotyping test to assess the activity of the cytochrome isoenzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 (responsible for ranolazine metabolism) was performed, with dextromethorphan used as the probe drug. The urinary metabolic ratios indicated relatively low activity for CYP3A4 and intermediate activity for CYP2D6.
DISCUSSION: The causal role of ranolazine in our case of bladder hypotonia is probable according to the Naranjo criteria. The mechanism of bladder dysfunction is tentatively ascribed to blockage of late sodium current in smooth muscle cells. Although drug plasma concentrations were not measured, they were probably elevated, since the metabolic activity of CYP3A4 was at the lower end of the reference range. Enzyme inhibition produced by diltiazem may have contributed to decreasing CYP3A4 activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute urinary retention in elderly men taking ranolazine may be due to drug-induced bladder hypotonia.