MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of rhinology · 2008

Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study.

Smirnov Grigori, Tuomilehto Henri, Teräsvirta Markku, Nuutinen Juhani, Seppä Juha

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an effective procedure when treating saccal and postsaccal obstructions of the nasolacrimal pathway. The benefit of silicone tubing after DCR is still controversial. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the necessity of bicanalicular silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR.

METHODS

Forty-six consecutive primary EN-DCR procedures were performed in 42 patients during 2004-2007. The patients were randomized into two study groups according to whether silicone tubing was used or not.

RESULTS

The overall success rate after primary EN-DCR was 89%: with silicone tubes it was 78%, and without silicone tubes it was 100%. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (p<0.049). The follow-up period was 6 months and included three follow-up visits: 1 week, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. If inserted, the silicone tubes were removed at the 2-month visit.

CONCLUSION

The results of our prospective, randomized study showed that the use of silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR is not necessary.

Для цитирования: Smirnov Grigori, Tuomilehto Henri, Teräsvirta Markku, Nuutinen Juhani, Seppä Juha. Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study.. American journal of rhinology. 2008. DOI: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.