[Comparison of interventional and surgical treatment of paravalvular leak after cardiac valve replacement].

Objective

To assess the immediate and mid-term outcomes and hospital costs of patients who underwent trans-catheter closure (TC) or surgical closure (SC) of perivalvular leakage (PVL).

Methods

Patients who underwent treatment of TC and SC of PVL in our center between January 2016 and December 2019 were enrolled. Baseline characteristics, procedure success, in-hospital and mid-term outcomes and hospital costs were compared.

Results

A total of 141 patients were enrolled (TC, n=65 and SC, n=76). The patients in TC group were elder ((56.8±12.8) years vs (50.1±12.8) years, t=-3.124, P=0.002). Technical success was significant higher in the SC group (83.1% vs 98.7%, χ²=10.960, P<0.001). And the residual PVLs were less in SC group (33.3% vs 13.3%, χ²=-2.525, P=0.012). One patient in SC group had procedure-related death. Procedure room time ((93±38) min vs (395±132) min, t=19.065, P<0.001), intensive care unit time (0 h vs 28 (21, 74)h, Z=-10.738, P<0.001), length of stay from hospitalization to discharge (7 (4, 10) days vs 21 (15, 25) days, Z=-8.075, P<0.001) and costs (¥46 073 (36 837, 52 448) vs ¥130 798 (104 048, 186 188), Z=-10.059, P<0.001) were significantly less in TC group. After risk adjustment, there was no significant difference in 30 days survival between TC group and SC group. At a median follow-up of 21 months, there was a trend towards reduced all-cause death following TC versus SC (OR = 0.054, 95%CI: 0.07 to 0.445, P= 0.007).

Conclusions

SC for PVL is associated with higher technical rates and less residual shunt compared with TC approach. But, the shorter length of stay and lower resources use with TC group significantly reduce hospital costs. In addition, TC achieve a better mid-term results in survival.