Neurosurgery · 2024
A Speech Neuroprosthesis in the Frontal Lobe and Hippocampus: Decoding High-Frequency Activity into Phonemes.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tankus Ariel, Stern Einat, Klein Guy, Kaptzon Nufar, Nash Lilac, Marziano Tal, Shamia Omer, Gurevitch Guy, Bergman Lottem, Goldstein Lilach, Fahoum Firas, Strauss Ido
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Loss of speech due to injury or disease is devastating. Here, we report a novel speech neuroprosthesis that artificially articulates building blocks of speech based on high-frequency activity in brain areas never harnessed for a neuroprosthesis before: anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices, and hippocampus.
METHODS: A 37-year-old male neurosurgical epilepsy patient with intact speech, implanted with depth electrodes for clinical reasons only, silently controlled the neuroprosthesis almost immediately and in a natural way to voluntarily produce 2 vowel sounds.
RESULTS: During the first set of trials, the participant made the neuroprosthesis produce the different vowel sounds artificially with 85% accuracy. In the following trials, performance improved consistently, which may be attributed to neuroplasticity. We show that a neuroprosthesis trained on overt speech data may be controlled silently.
CONCLUSION: This may open the way for a novel strategy of neuroprosthesis implantation at earlier disease stages (eg, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), while speech is intact, for improved training that still allows silent control at later stages. The results demonstrate clinical feasibility of direct decoding of high-frequency activity that includes spiking activity in the aforementioned areas for silent production of phonemes that may serve as a part of a neuroprosthesis for replacing lost speech control pathways.
METHODS: A 37-year-old male neurosurgical epilepsy patient with intact speech, implanted with depth electrodes for clinical reasons only, silently controlled the neuroprosthesis almost immediately and in a natural way to voluntarily produce 2 vowel sounds.
RESULTS: During the first set of trials, the participant made the neuroprosthesis produce the different vowel sounds artificially with 85% accuracy. In the following trials, performance improved consistently, which may be attributed to neuroplasticity. We show that a neuroprosthesis trained on overt speech data may be controlled silently.
CONCLUSION: This may open the way for a novel strategy of neuroprosthesis implantation at earlier disease stages (eg, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), while speech is intact, for improved training that still allows silent control at later stages. The results demonstrate clinical feasibility of direct decoding of high-frequency activity that includes spiking activity in the aforementioned areas for silent production of phonemes that may serve as a part of a neuroprosthesis for replacing lost speech control pathways.