MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/rc9.0000000000000781

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery case reports · 2026

Ectopic splenic volvulus and infarction: a case report.

Kinson Mignonne, Rathnasena Thilina, Piratheep K

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

A wandering (ectopic) spleen is a rare clinical condition caused by laxity or absence of the splenic ligaments, predisposing it to torsion and subsequent infarction. A computed tomography (CT) scan remains one of the most valuable diagnostic modalities for identifying this condition and its complications.

CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 53-year-old woman who presented with non-specific lower abdominal pain. CT of the abdomen revealed an ectopic spleen complicated by torsion and infarction. Emergency laparotomy showed a twisted vascular pedicle and hemoperitoneum with splenic lacerations. Splenectomy was performed, and histology confirmed infarction.

DISCUSSION: Volvulus with infarction of an ectopic spleen is a rare cause of an acute abdomen that mimics other, more common causes, making CT imaging essential for diagnosis, with features such as the whirl sign and an absent splenic position. Management depends on the viability of the spleen. Splenopexy is considered when the spleen is viable, whereas splenectomy is performed in cases of infarction.

CONCLUSION

Torsion of a wandering spleen is a surgical emergency. Early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention will reduce the likelihood of splenectomy and thereby the risk of related complications.

Для цитирования: Kinson Mignonne, Rathnasena Thilina, Piratheep K. Ectopic splenic volvulus and infarction: a case report.. International journal of surgery case reports. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/rc9.0000000000000781.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.