MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10147-017-1121-2

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of clinical oncology · 2017

Dominant lymph drainage patterns in the occipital and parietal regions: evaluation of lymph nodes in patients with skin cancer of the head.

Maeda Taku, Yamamoto Yuhei, Furukawa Hiroshi, Oyama Akihiko, Funayama Emi, Murao Naoki, Hayashi Toshihiko

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the superficial lymph drainage patterns of primary skin cancers of the head arising from the occipital or parietal region.

METHODS

The dominant patterns of lymph drainage were retrospectively reviewed in eight patients aged 36-85 years with skin cancers in the occipital or parietal region in whom sentinel lymph node biopsy or lymph node dissection had been performed at Hokkaido University Hospital between January 1981 and December 2015.

RESULTS

Lymph drainage was mainly to the occipital (6/8, 75%), level II (5/8, 63%), and level V lymph nodes (5/8, 63%). Of the six patients with drainage to the occipital lymph nodes, four (67%) also had drainage to level V nodes.

CONCLUSION

The dominant lymph drainage pattern in patients with skin cancer arising from the occipital or parietal region was to the occipital, level II, and level V lymph nodes. Further, lymph tended to drain directly from the occipital region to the level V lymph nodes.

Для цитирования: Maeda Taku, Yamamoto Yuhei, Furukawa Hiroshi, Oyama Akihiko, Funayama Emi, Murao Naoki, Hayashi Toshihiko. Dominant lymph drainage patterns in the occipital and parietal regions: evaluation of lymph nodes in patients with skin cancer of the head.. International journal of clinical oncology. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1121-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.