MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.10.001

Медицинская библиотека · Brain and language · 2016

Neural substrates of sublexical processing for spelling.

DeMarco Andrew T, Wilson Stephen M, Rising Kindle, Rapcsak Steven Z, Beeson Pélagie M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We used fMRI to examine the neural substrates of sublexical phoneme-grapheme conversion during spelling in a group of healthy young adults. Participants performed a writing-to-dictation task involving irregular words (e.g., choir), plausible nonwords (e.g., kroid), and a control task of drawing familiar geometric shapes (e.g., squares). Written production of both irregular words and nonwords engaged a left-hemisphere perisylvian network associated with reading/spelling and phonological processing skills. Effects of lexicality, manifested by increased activation during nonword relative to irregular word spelling, were noted in anterior perisylvian regions (posterior inferior frontal gyrus/operculum/precentral gyrus/insula), and in left ventral occipito-temporal cortex. In addition to enhanced neural responses within domain-specific components of the language network, the increased cognitive demands associated with spelling nonwords engaged domain-general frontoparietal cortical networks involved in selective attention and executive control. These results elucidate the neural substrates of sublexical processing during written language production and complement lesion-deficit correlation studies of phonological agraphia.

Для цитирования: DeMarco Andrew T, Wilson Stephen M, Rising Kindle, Rapcsak Steven Z, Beeson Pélagie M. Neural substrates of sublexical processing for spelling.. Brain and language. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.10.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.