MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.24675

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2016

Free profunda femoris artery perforator flap as a first-line choice of reconstruction for partial glossectomy defects.

Fernández-Riera Ricardo, Hung Shao-Yu, Wu Jerry Chih-Wei, Tsao Chung-Kan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Free profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap has recently been brought back for head and neck reconstruction. During the course of 1 year, we performed this procedure for reconstruction of partial glossectomy defects with excellent results.

METHODS

From January through December 2015, 21 patients underwent partial glossectomy reconstruction with PAP flaps. Demographics, surgical technique, anatomic variations, success rates, complications, and characteristics are described. Swallowing and speech results after reconstruction are evaluated.

RESULTS

No donor-site complications were observed. Two cases presented complications potentially related to the flap (1 hematoma and 1 prolonged intubation) that were treated successfully. Deglutition and speech assessment resulted in fair to excellent swallowing capacity in all patients. Speech score resulted 4/5 to 5/5 in all patients at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The PAP flap should be considered one of the first-line options for hemiglossectomy reconstruction, receiving special consideration in the high-risk population in which future complex reconstructions could be needed. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 737-743, 2017.

Для цитирования: Fernández-Riera Ricardo, Hung Shao-Yu, Wu Jerry Chih-Wei, Tsao Chung-Kan. Free profunda femoris artery perforator flap as a first-line choice of reconstruction for partial glossectomy defects.. Head & neck. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24675.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.