MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/aci.0000000000001050

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2024

The role of macrolides in chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.

Suzaki Isao

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous condition, so personalized treatment based on each patient's pathophysiology is essential, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Drug therapy for CRS has evolved significantly in recent years with the introduction of biologics, necessitating a reconsideration of the role of low-dose and long-term administration of a 14-membered ring macrolide (macrolide therapy) in the treatment of CRS. Recent research on the mechanisms of macrolide therapy and its proper use may assist physicians in improving patients' quality of life and reducing disease burden.

RECENT FINDINGS: A classification of the pathogenesis of CRS based on endotype has been proposed, with type 2 inflammation playing a particularly important role as a refractory factor. Macrolide therapy improves CRS via immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects rather than antimicrobial action, and it is expected to be effective in patients with neutrophil-dominant inflammation.

SUMMARY: Understanding the effectiveness and limitations of macrolide therapy is critical for making the best treatment decisions, especially when combined with surgery and other pharmacologic therapies. Therefore, selecting appropriate patients for macrolide therapy is critical for achieving adequate therapeutic efficacy.

Для цитирования: Suzaki Isao. The role of macrolides in chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000001050.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.