DOI 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.10.004
Thrombus aspiration for the treatment of definite stent thrombosis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Thrombus aspiration (TA) has been associated with high rates of thrombotic material retrieval, which results in improved myocardial reperfusion. In addition, a recent study has shown that systematic TA for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) related to de novo lesions improves patient outcomes.
AIMS: Evaluation of a single-centre experience of TA before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stent thrombosis (ST) treatment.
METHODS
Between 2004 and 2006, we indexed 24 patients presenting with definite ST. All patients underwent TA (Export Medtronic 6F catheter) followed by PCI for ST treatment. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, and complications related to the TA device were indexed.
RESULTS
The median time of ST occurrence was 7 days. All patients except one presented with STEMI. Bare-metal and drug-eluting ST represented 70.8% and 29.2% of cases, respectively. Mean stent length was 18.8 + or - 5.6mm; mean stent diameter was 2.8 + or - 0.4mm; mean number of implanted stents was 1.58 + or - 0.7. There was no failure to cross the catheter and no TA device-related complications were reported. The numbers of patients with initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grades 0, 1 and 2 were 15 (62.5%), 3 (12.5%) and 6 (25.0%), respectively. No patient had TIMI flow grade 3 before TA. After TA, 16 (66.7%) patients had TIMI flow grade 3; final procedural success was obtained in 23 (95.8%) patients. The 1-year death rate was 12.5%.
CONCLUSIONS
In our experience, TA before PCI for ST treatment shows promising results, providing high rates of immediate reperfusion and final angiographic success, and low death rates, compared with the literature.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.