MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0028-3886.338728

Медицинская библиотека · Neurology India · 2022

Thirteen-and-a-half Syndrome Secondary to the Brainstem Cavernoma.

Gosal Jaskaran Singh, Khatri Deepak, Das Kuntal Kanti, Gajbhiye Sanjog, Mehrotra Anant, Jaiswal Awadhesh Kumar, Behari Sanjay

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

"Thirteen-and-a-half" is a newly described clinical syndrome characterized by the combination of the one-and-a-half syndrome with fifth and seventh cranial nerve nuclei involvement (11/2 + 5 + 7 = 131/2). To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of the thirteen-and-a-half syndrome secondary to pontine cavernoma and, overall, only the second reported case of this syndrome in the literature till date.

CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old man presented with the clinical features suggestive of the thirteen-and-a-half syndrome, explained radiologically by pontine cavernoma. We operated him using a suboccipital transvermian approach and he is doing well at 2.5 years follow-up. Interestingly, his one-and-a-half syndrome has partially improved to left horizontal gaze palsy.

CONCLUSION

The clinical appreciation of the thirteen-and-a-half syndrome precisely localizes the lesion to ipsilateral dorsal pontine tegmentum. Neurosurgeons must be aware of the newly described "one-and-a-half- plus" syndromes as they help in a better understanding of pathoanatomy caused by different disease processes in the brainstem.

Для цитирования: Gosal Jaskaran Singh, Khatri Deepak, Das Kuntal Kanti, Gajbhiye Sanjog, Mehrotra Anant, Jaiswal Awadhesh Kumar, Behari Sanjay. Thirteen-and-a-half Syndrome Secondary to the Brainstem Cavernoma.. Neurology India. 2022. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.338728.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.