Cardiology · 2012
'Bovine' aortic arch - a marker for thoracic aortic disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hornick Matthew, Moomiaie Remo, Mojibian Hamid, Ziganshin Bulat, Almuwaqqat Zakaria, Lee Esther S, Rizzo John A, Tranquilli Maryann, Elefteriades John A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Very few studies have addressed the clinical significance of 'bovine' aortic arch (BA). We sought to determine whether BA is associated with thoracic aortic disease, including thoracic aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, aortic rupture, and accelerated aortic growth rate.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed CT and/or MRI scans of 612 patients with thoracic aortic disease and 844 patients without thoracic aortic disease to determine BA prevalence. In patients with thoracic aortic disease, we reviewed hospital records to determine growth rate, prevalence of dissection and rupture, and accuracy of radiology reports in citing BA.
RESULTS: 26.3% of the patients with thoracic aortic disease had concomitant BA, compared to 16.4% of the patients without thoracic aortic disease (p < 0.001). There was no association between BA and prevalence of dissection or rupture (p = 0.38 and p = 0.56, respectively). The aortic expansion rate was 0.29 cm/year in the BA group and 0.09 cm/year in the non-BA group (p = 0.004). Radiology reports cited BA in only 16.1% of the affected patients.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) BA is significantly more common in patients with thoracic aortic disease than in the general population. (2) Aortas expand more rapidly in the setting of BA. (3) Radiology reports often overlook BA. (4) BA should not be considered a 'normal' anatomic variant.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed CT and/or MRI scans of 612 patients with thoracic aortic disease and 844 patients without thoracic aortic disease to determine BA prevalence. In patients with thoracic aortic disease, we reviewed hospital records to determine growth rate, prevalence of dissection and rupture, and accuracy of radiology reports in citing BA.
RESULTS: 26.3% of the patients with thoracic aortic disease had concomitant BA, compared to 16.4% of the patients without thoracic aortic disease (p < 0.001). There was no association between BA and prevalence of dissection or rupture (p = 0.38 and p = 0.56, respectively). The aortic expansion rate was 0.29 cm/year in the BA group and 0.09 cm/year in the non-BA group (p = 0.004). Radiology reports cited BA in only 16.1% of the affected patients.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) BA is significantly more common in patients with thoracic aortic disease than in the general population. (2) Aortas expand more rapidly in the setting of BA. (3) Radiology reports often overlook BA. (4) BA should not be considered a 'normal' anatomic variant.