Japanese heart journal · 1995
Comparison of long-term efficacy of medical treatment versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in single-vessel disease.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nishiyama S, Iwase T, Ishiwata S, Komiyama N, Yanagishita Y, Nakanishi S, Seki A
Аннотация
The long-term outcome of PTCA and medical therapy were compared in patients with SVD. All patients were confirmed to have > or - 75% stenosis of a major coronary artery by coronary arteriogram. The 5-year survival rates were 96.0% for medical therapy and 98.9% for successful angioplasty. Both therapies achieved an equally good long-term outcome for SVD. The incidence of nonfatal cardiac events during follow-up was higher in patients treated by PTCA than in those on medical therapy, but there was no difference between the two groups in the incidence of nonfatal MI at 5 years (2.5% vs 1.8%). The most common cardiac event in patients undergoing successful PTCA was repeat intervention associated with restenosis. In view of the long-term efficacy of PTCA, the high restenosis rate remains an important problem and it is necessary to elucidate the causes of restenosis and develop countermeasures as soon as possible.