MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/sj.sc.3101964

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord · 2006

A case of intraroot cauda equina cavernous angioma: clinical considerations.

Caroli E, Acqui M, Trasimeni G, Di Stefano D, Ferrante L

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE

Intradural-extramedullary cavernoma is a rare condition with only 23 cases reported in the literature. Most cases described adhere to spinal root or spinal cord. We report an example of this rare entity located within the sheets of one cauda equina nerve root.

SETTING

Rome, Italy.

METHODS

The authors report clinical, radiological, surgical, and pathological features of intraroot cavernoma with a literature review.

RESULTS

Patient was operated. One year after surgery, he was healthy.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar intradural cavernous angioma may present with sciatalgia, low-back pain, neurological deficit, or, more rarely with subarachnoid hemorrhage or hydrocephalus. They are treated successfully with surgical resection but preoperative status is a predicting factor for outcome. Sometimes the sacrifice of the spinal root is inevitable because, as in present case, the cavernous angioma is included in the nerve root. These lesions are rare and benign lesions. It is important for neurosurgeons to be aware of the existence of this entity to avoid preoperative misdiagnosis with tumor.

Для цитирования: Caroli E, Acqui M, Trasimeni G, Di Stefano D, Ferrante L. A case of intraroot cauda equina cavernous angioma: clinical considerations.. Spinal cord. 2006. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101964.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.