CJC open · 2023
Half-Normal Saline vs Normal Saline for Cavotricuspid Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter Ablation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Leon Ana, Hanson Matthew, Alhammad Nasser, Bakker David, Chacko Sanoj, Simpson Christopher, Abdollah Hoshiar, Baranchuk Adrian, Redfearn Damian, Glover Benedict, Enriquez Andres, Neira Victor
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation requires permanent bidirectional block to prevent recurrence of typical atrial flutter (AFL). Catheter irrigation with half-normal saline (HNS) produces larger and deeper lesions in experimental models compared with normal saline (NS). This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of HNS vs NS irrigation for typical AFL ablation.
METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing catheter ablation of typical AFL were randomized 1:1 to NS or HNS irrigation. Endpoints included time to CTI block, acute reconnection, incidence of steam pops, and recurrence of AFL during follow-up.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between both arms. The mean age of the patients was 68.5 ± 8.2 years, 20% were female, and 32% had atrial fibrillation before being enrolled. Bidirectional CTI block was obtained in all patients with no difference in time to CTI block between groups (6.4 ± 4.4 minutes vs 7.6 ± 4.5 minutes, respectively; P = 0.15). There was a trend to less acute reconnection in the HNS group compared with NS (13.3% vs 26.6%; P = 0.46). Steam pops occurred in 4 patients using HNS vs none in the NS group, but no major complications were observed. During the follow-up, rate of AFL recurrence was similar between groups (6.7% with HNS vs 10% with NS; P = 0.5). There was no difference in time to recurrence (7.6 ± 6.9 vs 4.9 ± 4.5 months; P = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: In this small pilot randomized controlled trial, there was no significant difference between HNS and NS for CTI ablation; however, HNS may increase the incidence of steam pops.
METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing catheter ablation of typical AFL were randomized 1:1 to NS or HNS irrigation. Endpoints included time to CTI block, acute reconnection, incidence of steam pops, and recurrence of AFL during follow-up.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between both arms. The mean age of the patients was 68.5 ± 8.2 years, 20% were female, and 32% had atrial fibrillation before being enrolled. Bidirectional CTI block was obtained in all patients with no difference in time to CTI block between groups (6.4 ± 4.4 minutes vs 7.6 ± 4.5 minutes, respectively; P = 0.15). There was a trend to less acute reconnection in the HNS group compared with NS (13.3% vs 26.6%; P = 0.46). Steam pops occurred in 4 patients using HNS vs none in the NS group, but no major complications were observed. During the follow-up, rate of AFL recurrence was similar between groups (6.7% with HNS vs 10% with NS; P = 0.5). There was no difference in time to recurrence (7.6 ± 6.9 vs 4.9 ± 4.5 months; P = 0.6).
CONCLUSIONS: In this small pilot randomized controlled trial, there was no significant difference between HNS and NS for CTI ablation; however, HNS may increase the incidence of steam pops.