MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.038

Медицинская библиотека · Heart rhythm · 2021

Differentiating atrial tachycardias with centrifugal activation: Lessons from high-resolution mapping.

Takigawa Masateru, Takagi Takamitsu, Martin Claire A, Derval Nicolas, Denis Arnaud, Vlachos Konstantinos, Cheniti Ghassen, Duchateau Josselin, Pambrun Thomas, Shirai Yasuhiro, Tao Susumu, Takahashi Yoshihide, Goya Masahiko, Sacher Frederic, Cochet Hubert, Hocini Meleze, Haissaguerre Michel, Sasano Tetsuo, Jais Pierre

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Centrifugal activation is not always the origin of a focal atrial tachycardia (AT) ("true-focal"), but passive activation from the other structures ("pseudo-focal").

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to establish a method to differentiate true-focal from pseudo-focal.

METHODS

In 49 centrifugal activations in 35 patients with AT, 12-lead electrocardiogram, activation map, atrial global activation histogram (GAH), and local electrograms were analyzed. GAH demonstrates the relation between the activation area and timing through the cycle length, displayed with a normalized value, ranging from 0 (smallest activation area) to 1.0 (largest activation area).

RESULTS

Of 30 centrifugal activations observed in the septal region, 6/30 (20.0%) were true-focal. The remaining 24/60 (80.0%) were pseudo-focal, of which 23 (95.8%) were from the opposite chamber. P-wave/flutter-wave duration < 200 ms discriminated true-focal from pseudo-focal (sensitivity 100%; specificity 54.5%; positive predictive value 33.3%; negative predictive value 100%). Multiple breakthrough ruled out the possibility of a true-focal AT. Other differentiating factors were an activation area within the initial 20 ms of <5 mm2 and a typical QS pattern electrogram at the origin. Of 19 centrifugal activations observed outside the septal regions, 7 were true-focal and 12 were pseudo-focal exited from an epicardial structure: 10 of 12 (83.3%) were located around the left atrial appendage and ridge. Flutter wave, GAH score ≤ 0.05, and GAH score < 0.1 for >110 ms of cycle length differentiated true-focal from pseudo-focal with a sensitivity/negative predictive value of 100%. GAH score < 0.1 for >40% of the cycle length simply discriminated true-focal from pseudo-focal with 100% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Centrifugal activation is not necessarily due to a focal AT but passive activation. The activation map with GAH in addition to the 12-lead electrocardiogram and local electrograms enables an accurate differentiation.

Для цитирования: Takigawa Masateru, Takagi Takamitsu, Martin Claire A, Derval Nicolas, Denis Arnaud, Vlachos Konstantinos, Cheniti Ghassen, Duchateau Josselin, Pambrun Thomas, Shirai Yasuhiro, Tao Susumu, Takahashi Yoshihide, Goya Masahiko, Sacher Frederic, Cochet Hubert, Hocini Meleze, Haissaguerre Michel, Sasano Tetsuo, Jais Pierre. Differentiating atrial tachycardias with centrifugal activation: Lessons from high-resolution mapping.. Heart rhythm. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.038.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.