MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.022

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of cardiology · 2012

Comparison of outcomes in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus after revascularization with everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents (from the SORT OUT IV trial).

Jensen Lisette Okkels, Thayssen Per, Junker Anders, Maeng Michael, Tilsted Hans-Henrik, Kaltoft Anne, Hansen Knud Nørregaard, Christiansen Evald Høj, Kristensen Steen Dalby, Ravkilde Jan, Madsen Morten, Sørensen Henrik Toft, Thuesen Leif, Lassen Jens Flensted

Клиническое исследование IV фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Diabetes is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) after percutaneous coronary intervention. The purpose of this substudy of the SORT OUT IV trial was to compare clinical outcomes in patients with and without diabetes mellitus treated with everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) or sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs). In total 2,774 patients (390 with diabetes, 14.1%) were randomized to stent implantation with EESs (n = 1,390, diabetes in 14.0%) or SESs (n = 1,384, diabetes in 14.2%). Randomization was stratified by presence/absence of diabetes. The primary end point was MACEs, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization within 18 months. MACEs were higher in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients (13.1% vs 6.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51 to 2.86). In diabetic patients, MACEs were seen in 10.3% of those treated with EESs and in 15.8% of those treated with SESs (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.11). In nondiabetic patients, MACEs occurred in 6.6% of EES-treated and in 6.3% SES-treated patients (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.46). In diabetics, cardiac death occurred in 3.1% of EES-treated and in 4.6% of SES-treated patients (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.89), myocardial infarction occurred in 0.5% of EES-treated and in 3.6% of SES-treated patients (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.16), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization was needed in 3.1% of EES-treated and in 7.7% of SES-treated patients (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.02). No interaction between diabetes status and type of drug-eluting stent was found for the end points. In conclusion, patients with diabetes have higher MACE rates than nondiabetics. No significant differences in safety or efficacy outcomes after EES or SES implantation were present in nondiabetic or diabetic patients.

Для цитирования: Jensen Lisette Okkels, Thayssen Per, Junker Anders, Maeng Michael, Tilsted Hans-Henrik, Kaltoft Anne, Hansen Knud Nørregaard, Christiansen Evald Høj, Kristensen Steen Dalby, Ravkilde Jan, Madsen Morten, Sørensen Henrik Toft, Thuesen Leif, Lassen Jens Flensted. Comparison of outcomes in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus after revascularization with everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents (from the SORT OUT IV trial).. The American journal of cardiology. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.022.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.