Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025
AI-Assisted 3D Planning of CT Parameters for Personalized Femoral Prosthesis Selection in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang Tian-Jiao, Qian Wei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of CT measurement parameters combined with AI-assisted 3D planning for personalized femoral prosthesis selection in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 247 patients with unilateral hip or knee joint disorders treated at Renmin Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine between April 2021 and February 2024. All patients underwent preoperative full-pelvis and bilateral full-length femoral CT scans. The raw CT data were imported into Mimics 19.0 software to reconstruct a three-dimensional (3D) model of the healthy femur. Using 3-matic Research 11.0 software, the femoral head rotation center was located, and parameters including femoral head diameter (FHD), femoral neck length (FNL), femoral neck-shaft angle (FNSA), femoral offset (FO), femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA), tip-apex distance (TAD), and tip-apex angle (TAA) were measured. AI-assisted THA 3D planning system AIJOINT V1.0.0.0 software was used for preoperative planning and design, enabling personalized selection of femoral prostheses with varying neck-shaft angles and surgical simulation. Groups were compared by gender, age, and parameters. ROC curves evaluated prediction efficacy.
RESULTS: Females exhibited smaller FHD, FNL, FO, TAD, TAA but larger FNSA/FNAA vs males (P<0.05). Patients >65 years had higher FO, TAD, TAA (P<0.05). TAD-TAA correlation was strong (r=0.954), while FNSA negatively correlated with TAD/TAA (r=-0.773/-0.701). ROC analysis demonstrated high predictive accuracy: TAD (AUC=0.891, sensitivity=91.7%, specificity=87.6%) and TAA (AUC=0.882, sensitivity=100%, specificity=88.8%).
CONCLUSION: CT parameters (TAA, TAD, FNSA, FO) are interrelated and effective predictors for femoral prosthesis selection. Integration with AI-assisted planning optimizes personalized THA, reducing biomechanical mismatch risks.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 247 patients with unilateral hip or knee joint disorders treated at Renmin Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine between April 2021 and February 2024. All patients underwent preoperative full-pelvis and bilateral full-length femoral CT scans. The raw CT data were imported into Mimics 19.0 software to reconstruct a three-dimensional (3D) model of the healthy femur. Using 3-matic Research 11.0 software, the femoral head rotation center was located, and parameters including femoral head diameter (FHD), femoral neck length (FNL), femoral neck-shaft angle (FNSA), femoral offset (FO), femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA), tip-apex distance (TAD), and tip-apex angle (TAA) were measured. AI-assisted THA 3D planning system AIJOINT V1.0.0.0 software was used for preoperative planning and design, enabling personalized selection of femoral prostheses with varying neck-shaft angles and surgical simulation. Groups were compared by gender, age, and parameters. ROC curves evaluated prediction efficacy.
RESULTS: Females exhibited smaller FHD, FNL, FO, TAD, TAA but larger FNSA/FNAA vs males (P<0.05). Patients >65 years had higher FO, TAD, TAA (P<0.05). TAD-TAA correlation was strong (r=0.954), while FNSA negatively correlated with TAD/TAA (r=-0.773/-0.701). ROC analysis demonstrated high predictive accuracy: TAD (AUC=0.891, sensitivity=91.7%, specificity=87.6%) and TAA (AUC=0.882, sensitivity=100%, specificity=88.8%).
CONCLUSION: CT parameters (TAA, TAD, FNSA, FO) are interrelated and effective predictors for femoral prosthesis selection. Integration with AI-assisted planning optimizes personalized THA, reducing biomechanical mismatch risks.