Real-word evidence on healthcare resource use and associated costs in on-demand users of replacement therapies in von Willebrand disease in France: the FORvWARD study.

Background

Real-world data about use of Von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates to manage on-demand patients with Von Willebrand disease (VWD) are scarce. Aim: To describe and compare patients' characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource use and associated costs of patients with VWD using VWF concentrates. Materials & methods: Using the French healthcare claims database, we included adult patients with ≥1 reimbursement for a replacement therapy (RT) containing VWF concentrate between 1 January 2017 and 30 September 2021 and followed them from first RT dispensation to 31 December 2021. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource use and associated costs of RT on-demand users were evaluated over each 30-days exposure period (EP) starting the first day of each hospital stay with ≥1 RT administration. In- and out-hospital RT doses and FVIII, number of general practitioner and nurse visits, in- and out-hospital RT dispensings and length of hospitalizations and their costs were described and compared across RTs using adjusted Generalized Estimating Equation models accounting for confounding factors.

Results

Among 2540 on-demand RT users, WILFACTIN® was the main RT used, followed by VONCENTO®, VEYVONDI®, EQWILATE® and WILSTART®. Overall, the mean total RT dose was 12,962 IU and the mean cost was €21,034/EP. Compared with VEYVONDI®-treated EP, WILFACTIN®-treated EP had significantly longer stay duration, had more out-hospital RT dose and had higher overall and in-hospital costs; VONCENTO®-treated EP had more overall and in-hospital RT dose, and had higher in-hospital and RT-related costs.

Conclusion

This first real-world study suggests that VEYVONDI® seems to be a cost-saving RT compared with other RT. Future studies including clinical data should provide further evidence.