MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.langlo.2026.103979

Медицинская библиотека · The Lancet. Global health · 2026

Genetic testing versus clinical screening for relatives of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the Brazilian public health system: a cost-utility analysis.

Braga Andressa, Santos Marisa, Tura Bernardo, Correia Marcelo, Carvalho Adriana Bastos, Kasai-Brunswick Tais Hanae, Barbosa Raiana Andrade Quintanilha, Campos Dilza, Rangel Milene, Magliano Carlos

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an autosomal dominant myocardial disorder affecting 0·2% of the global population and a leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young individuals and athletes. Current guidelines recommend periodic clinical screening of first-degree relatives for early diagnosis and risk stratification. Genetic testing identifies at-risk individuals while exempting genotype-negative relatives from lifelong surveillance. However, it remains unavailable in Brazil's public health system (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of genetic testing for HCM cascade screening in Brazil.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis was conducted from the SUS perspective, using a hybrid decision tree and Markov model to project lifetime costs and health outcomes. Inputs were derived from literature and validated by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Genetic testing costs were micro-costed; other costs were obtained from Brazil's national reimbursement database (SIGTAP). Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Deterministic and probabilistic analyses assessed model robustness.

FINDINGS: Genetic testing was cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: US$1411 per QALY), yielding an incremental gain of 0·06 QALYs per relative at an additional cost of $87 per relative. Utility values had the greatest influence on cost-utility outcomes. In probabilistic analysis, genetic testing was cost-effective in 99·4% of simulations at the Brazilian willingness-to-pay threshold of $7421 per QALY. In the base-case hypothetical cohort of 1000 relatives (250 probands with four first-degree relatives each), 205 (20·5%) of 1000 relatives were exempted from lifelong surveillance, reducing screening visits by 18·6% per tested individual.

INTERPRETATION: Genetic testing is a cost-effective strategy for HCM cascade screening in Brazil's public health system. By exempting genotype-negative relatives from lifelong surveillance, it optimises resource allocation, reduces unnecessary follow-ups and psychological burden, and supports informed family planning. These findings provide an economic evidence base for integrating genetic testing into SUS clinical practice guidelines.

FUNDING: Programa Nacional de Genômica e Saúde de Precisão (Genomas Brasil) of the Brazilian Ministry of Health and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.

Для цитирования: Braga Andressa, Santos Marisa, Tura Bernardo, Correia Marcelo, Carvalho Adriana Bastos, Kasai-Brunswick Tais Hanae, Barbosa Raiana Andrade Quintanilha, Campos Dilza, Rangel Milene, Magliano Carlos. Genetic testing versus clinical screening for relatives of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the Brazilian public health system: a cost-utility analysis.. The Lancet. Global health. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.langlo.2026.103979.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.