BMJ oncology · 2025
Disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in early-stage pancreatic cancer trials: a correlation meta-analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leite Luís Felipe, Costa de Almeida Luiz F, Diniz da Conceição Lucas, Macambira Noronha Mariana, Belotto Marcos, Saldanha Erick F, Megid Thais Baccili Cury, D'Alpino Peixoto Renata, Gyawali Bishal
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Disease-free survival (DFS) is frequently used as the primary endpoint in trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies for early-stage pancreatic cancer (PC), but its validity as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) remains uncertain. This study evaluates the strength and consistency of DFS as a surrogate for OS in early-stage PC trials.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Trials of early-stage PC involving drug therapy were identified through PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases, and data on DFS and OS with HR and CIs were extracted. Trial-level surrogacy of DFS for OS was assessed using weighted linear regression, calculating the coefficient of determination (R²) and surrogate threshold effect (STE).
RESULTS: 29 trials involving 6777 patients were included. In adjuvant trials, HR of DFS strongly correlated with HR of OS (R²=0.70) at trial-level, with the STE of 0.94 indicating the maximum DFS HR beyond which OS benefit was unlikely. The correlation strength differed between phase III (R²=0.71) versus phase II (R²=0.67) trials. This correlation was stronger in trials including radiation therapy (R²=0.81) and trials in the neoadjuvant setting (R²=0.90). No trial in our study was a registration trial of a new molecule and all involved chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Treatment effects on DFS had a strong correlation with treatment effects on OS, making DFS a potential surrogate endpoint for OS in early-stage PC trials of cytotoxic chemotherapies, but its use in registration trials requires careful consideration due to variability across treatment settings and trial designs.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024595441.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Trials of early-stage PC involving drug therapy were identified through PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases, and data on DFS and OS with HR and CIs were extracted. Trial-level surrogacy of DFS for OS was assessed using weighted linear regression, calculating the coefficient of determination (R²) and surrogate threshold effect (STE).
RESULTS: 29 trials involving 6777 patients were included. In adjuvant trials, HR of DFS strongly correlated with HR of OS (R²=0.70) at trial-level, with the STE of 0.94 indicating the maximum DFS HR beyond which OS benefit was unlikely. The correlation strength differed between phase III (R²=0.71) versus phase II (R²=0.67) trials. This correlation was stronger in trials including radiation therapy (R²=0.81) and trials in the neoadjuvant setting (R²=0.90). No trial in our study was a registration trial of a new molecule and all involved chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Treatment effects on DFS had a strong correlation with treatment effects on OS, making DFS a potential surrogate endpoint for OS in early-stage PC trials of cytotoxic chemotherapies, but its use in registration trials requires careful consideration due to variability across treatment settings and trial designs.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024595441.