MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.9412-13.2

Медицинская библиотека · Turkish neurosurgery · 2015

Intracranial Extracranial Huge Meningioma: Report of a Case.

Morina Arsim, Kelmendi Fatos, Morina Qamile, Morina Dukagjin, Mekaj Agon

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Meningioma accounts for 15% to 20% of all intracranial neoplasms. Intracranial meningioma is a common brain tumor but huge meningiomas with extracranial extensions are extremely rare. Various symptoms, including neurological deficits and epileptic seizures are very frequent in these cases. Surgery still remains the principal form of the treatment and must be preceded by appropriate preoperative diagnostics. We report an unusual case of a huge meningioma of the brain (intracranial-extracranial extension) invading and destroying the skull bone and subcutaneous and cutaneous tissue. A 44-year old man in otherwise good general health was admitted to our University Neurosurgical Clinic. The MRI revealed an intracranial-extracranial lesion invading the skull bone, subcutaneous and cutaneous tissue. The tumour was removed by microsurgery. The bone was found to be predominantly lytic, and dura was infiltrated by the tumor. The bone and the dura were completely removed together with the entire tumor. Such cases are very rarely seen these days because of modern radiology techniques A giant intracranial-extracranial meningioma is therefore very unusual. Radiotherapy is generally recommended for incompletely resected meningioma and malignant meningioma.

Для цитирования: Morina Arsim, Kelmendi Fatos, Morina Qamile, Morina Dukagjin, Mekaj Agon. Intracranial Extracranial Huge Meningioma: Report of a Case.. Turkish neurosurgery. 2015. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.9412-13.2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.