Gynecologic oncology · 2020
The effects of size and shape of the ovarian cancer spheroids on the drug resistance and migration.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gunay Gokhan, Kirit Hande A, Kamatar Advika, Baghdasaryan Ofelya, Hamsici Seren, Acar Handan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: High fatality in ovarian cancer is attributed to metastasis, propagated by the release of multi-cellular aggregates/spheroids into the peritoneal cavity and their subsequent mesothelial invasion of peritoneal organs. Spheroids are therefore a common and clinically relevant in vitro model for ovarian cancer research. Spheroids in patients vary significantly in size and shape and display enhanced resistance to anti-cancer drugs compared to monolayers. However, there is no consensus on how spheroid size and shape affect drug resistance. Moreover, existing data regarding the influence of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile on spheroid shape and migration is inconclusive.
METHODS: We formed spheroids with OVCAR-3 and OVCAR-8 cells, chosen for their established genetic similarity to the patient tumor samples. We monitored their morphology using confocal microscope with dipping objective and fluorescent microscope. We characterized important EMT biomarkers; E-cadherin, Vimentin and Slug through western blotting in monolayers and spheroids. We treated these spheroids with Taxol and Cisplatin and investigated their migratory profile based on their morphology.
RESULTS: We report two distinct multicellular structures: loose aggregates (OVCAR-3) and compact spheroids (OVCAR-8). We attribute these different morphologies to the expression of the EMT biomarkers, and their changes upon spheroid formation. Importantly, we did not observe a difference in resistance to the anti-cancer drugs as a function of spheroid size and shape. However, migration capacity of compact spheroid (OVCAR-8) was 15-fold higher compared to that of loose aggregates (OVCAR-3).
CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the importance of spheroid size and shape on anti-cancer drug resistance and migration profiles. The results of this study can, therefore, help to elucidate general rules for ovarian cancer studies based on 3D samples.
METHODS: We formed spheroids with OVCAR-3 and OVCAR-8 cells, chosen for their established genetic similarity to the patient tumor samples. We monitored their morphology using confocal microscope with dipping objective and fluorescent microscope. We characterized important EMT biomarkers; E-cadherin, Vimentin and Slug through western blotting in monolayers and spheroids. We treated these spheroids with Taxol and Cisplatin and investigated their migratory profile based on their morphology.
RESULTS: We report two distinct multicellular structures: loose aggregates (OVCAR-3) and compact spheroids (OVCAR-8). We attribute these different morphologies to the expression of the EMT biomarkers, and their changes upon spheroid formation. Importantly, we did not observe a difference in resistance to the anti-cancer drugs as a function of spheroid size and shape. However, migration capacity of compact spheroid (OVCAR-8) was 15-fold higher compared to that of loose aggregates (OVCAR-3).
CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the importance of spheroid size and shape on anti-cancer drug resistance and migration profiles. The results of this study can, therefore, help to elucidate general rules for ovarian cancer studies based on 3D samples.