MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/110241599750006479

Медицинская библиотека · The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica · 1999

Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation.

Hermansson M, Staël von Holstein C, Zilling T

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To find out which prognostic factors were important in predicting postoperative mortality and length of hospital stay in patients with perforated peptic ulcers.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital, Lund, Sweden.

SUBJECTS: 246 patients with perforated peptic ulcer who presented between January 1974 and December 1992.

INTERVENTION: Cox proportional hazards analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Influence of age, sex, coexisting disease, duration of symptoms, site of perforation and operative technique on mortality and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Age over 75 years (p = 0.002), coexisting cardiac or pulmonary disease (p = 0.02), perforation of the cardia or body of the stomach (p = 0.02), lapse of more than 12 hours between start of symptoms and operation (p = 0.006) and type of operation (p < 0.0001) had a significant influence on hospital mortality. Age over 75 years (p < 0.0001) and lapse of more than 12 hours between start of symptoms and operation (p = 0.03) significant influenced the likelihood of a prolonged stay in hospital.

CONCLUSION

Patients with perforated peptic ulcers should be operated on as soon as possible. Simple closure is simple and safe with relatively low mortality and short stay in hospital.

Для цитирования: Hermansson M, Staël von Holstein C, Zilling T. Surgical approach and prognostic factors after peptic ulcer perforation.. The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica. 1999. DOI: 10.1080/110241599750006479.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.