Blood cancer journal · 2020
Follicular lymphoma in the modern era: survival, treatment outcomes, and identification of high-risk subgroups.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Batlevi Connie L, Sha Fushen, Alperovich Anna, Ni Ai, Smith Katy, Ying Zhitao, Soumerai Jacob D, Caron Philip C, Falchi Lorenzo, Hamilton Audrey, Hamlin Paul A, Horwitz Steven M, Joffe Erel, Kumar Anita, Matasar Matthew J, Moskowitz Alison J, Moskowitz Craig H, Noy Ariela, Owens Colette, Palomba Lia M, Straus David, von Keudell Gottfried, Zelenetz Andrew D, Seshan Venkatraman E, Younes Anas
Аннотация
Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) frequently require multiple treatments during their disease course; however, survival based on lines of treatment remains poorly described in the post-rituximab era. Also, the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score was developed to predict survival at diagnosis, yet it remains unknown whether increase in FLIPI score following an initial observation period is associated with less-favorable outcomes. To address these knowledge gaps, we retrospectively studied 1088 patients with FL grade 1-3A managed between 1998 and 2009 at our institution. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line treatment were not reached and 4.73 years, respectively. Following successive lines of treatment, years of median OS and PFS were, respectively: after second-line, 11.7 and 1.5; third-line, 8.8 and 1.1; fourth-line, 5.3 and 0.9; fifth-line, 3.1 and 0.6; sixth-line, 1.9 and 0.5. In initially observed, subsequently treated patients, FLIPI score increase after observation was associated with inferior survival following first-line treatment. The reduced survival we observed after second-line and later therapy supports the development of new treatments for relapsed patients and benchmarks historical targets for clinical endpoints. This study also highlights the utility of changes in FLIPI score at diagnosis and after observation in identifying patients likely to have worse outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphoma, FollicularMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisPublic Health SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult