Veterinary surgery : VS · 2020
Influence of barbed epitendinous sutures combined with a core locking-loop suture to repair experimental flexor tendon lacerations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eby Adam C, Duffy Daniel J, Chang Yi-Jen, Gaffney Lewis, Fisher Matthew B, Moore George E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of barbed epitendinous sutures (ES) on the biomechanical properties and gap formation of repaired canine tendons.
STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo, experimental study.
SAMPLE POPULATION: Eighty (n = 16/group) canine superficial digital flexor tendons (SDFT).
METHODS: After transection, SDFT were repaired with a locking-loop (LL) pattern alone (group 1), an LL + smooth ES with monofilament suture (group 2), an LL + V-loc-ES (group 3), an LL + Quill-ES (group 4), or an LL + Stratafix-ES (group 5). All core LL repairs were performed with 0 USP polypropylene, and all ES were placed with 2-0 USP equivalent. Constructs were preloaded and tested to failure. Yield, peak, and failure loads; occurrence of gap formation; and failure modes were compared.
RESULTS: Yield loads were greater for groups 2 and 5 (P < .0001). Peak and failure loads were greater when an ES was used (P < .005), especially for groups 2 and 5 (P < .0001). Groups with an ES required higher loads to generate 1- and 3-mm gaps compared with specimens without an ES (P < .002). Force to create 1- and 3-mm gaps was greater for group 5 (P < .0001) and groups 2 and 5 (P < .0001), respectively. Failure mechanism did not differ (P = .092) between ES groups, consisting of suture breakage in 51 of 64 constructs compared with pull-through in seven of 16 group 1 constructs.
CONCLUSION: Epitendinous suture placement improved the biomechanical properties of repaired tendons. Stratafix barbed suture performed better as an ES compared with other barbed sutures and similarly to monofilament suture.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Stratafix barbed suture eliminates the requirement for knot tying and seems to be equivalent to smooth monofilament suture when used as an ES in this pattern.
STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo, experimental study.
SAMPLE POPULATION: Eighty (n = 16/group) canine superficial digital flexor tendons (SDFT).
METHODS: After transection, SDFT were repaired with a locking-loop (LL) pattern alone (group 1), an LL + smooth ES with monofilament suture (group 2), an LL + V-loc-ES (group 3), an LL + Quill-ES (group 4), or an LL + Stratafix-ES (group 5). All core LL repairs were performed with 0 USP polypropylene, and all ES were placed with 2-0 USP equivalent. Constructs were preloaded and tested to failure. Yield, peak, and failure loads; occurrence of gap formation; and failure modes were compared.
RESULTS: Yield loads were greater for groups 2 and 5 (P < .0001). Peak and failure loads were greater when an ES was used (P < .005), especially for groups 2 and 5 (P < .0001). Groups with an ES required higher loads to generate 1- and 3-mm gaps compared with specimens without an ES (P < .002). Force to create 1- and 3-mm gaps was greater for group 5 (P < .0001) and groups 2 and 5 (P < .0001), respectively. Failure mechanism did not differ (P = .092) between ES groups, consisting of suture breakage in 51 of 64 constructs compared with pull-through in seven of 16 group 1 constructs.
CONCLUSION: Epitendinous suture placement improved the biomechanical properties of repaired tendons. Stratafix barbed suture performed better as an ES compared with other barbed sutures and similarly to monofilament suture.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Stratafix barbed suture eliminates the requirement for knot tying and seems to be equivalent to smooth monofilament suture when used as an ES in this pattern.