Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2016
DNA Methylation and Mutation of Small Colonic Neoplasms in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Colitis: Implications for Surveillance.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Johnson David H, Taylor William R, Aboelsoud Mohammed M, Foote Patrick H, Yab Tracy C, Cao Xiaoming, Smyrk Thomas C, Loftus Edward V, Mahoney Douglas W, Ahlquist David A, Kisiel John B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Stool DNA testing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may detect colorectal cancer and advanced precancers with high sensitivity; less is known about the presence of DNA markers in small IBD lesions, their association with metachronous neoplasia, or contribution to stool test positivity.
METHODS: At a single center in 2 blinded phases, we assayed methylated bone morphogenic protein 3, methylated N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 4, and mutant KRAS in DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded benign lesions, and matched control tissues of patients with IBD, who were followed for subsequent colorectal dysplasia. Stool samples from independent cases and controls with lesions <1 cm or advanced neoplasms were assayed for the same markers.
RESULTS: Among IBD lesions (29 low-grade dysplasia, 19 serrated epithelial change, and 10 sessile serrated adenoma/polyps), the prevalence of methylation was significantly higher than in mucosae from 44 matched IBD controls (P < 0.0001 for methylated bone morphogenic protein 3 or methylated N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 4). KRAS mutations were more abundant in serrated epithelial change than all other groups (P < 0.001). Subsequent dysplasia was not associated with DNA marker levels. In stools, the sensitivity of methylated bone morphogenic protein 3 as a single marker was 60% for all lesions <1 cm, 63% for low-grade dysplasia ≥1 cm and 81% for high-grade dysplasia/colorectal cancer, all at 91% specificity (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Selected DNA markers known to be present in advanced IBD neoplasia can also be detected in both tissues and stools from IBD patients with small adenomas and serrated lesions. Mutant KRAS exfoliated from serrated epithelial change lesions might raise false-positive rates. These findings have relevance to potential future applications of stool DNA testing for IBD surveillance.
METHODS: At a single center in 2 blinded phases, we assayed methylated bone morphogenic protein 3, methylated N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 4, and mutant KRAS in DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded benign lesions, and matched control tissues of patients with IBD, who were followed for subsequent colorectal dysplasia. Stool samples from independent cases and controls with lesions <1 cm or advanced neoplasms were assayed for the same markers.
RESULTS: Among IBD lesions (29 low-grade dysplasia, 19 serrated epithelial change, and 10 sessile serrated adenoma/polyps), the prevalence of methylation was significantly higher than in mucosae from 44 matched IBD controls (P < 0.0001 for methylated bone morphogenic protein 3 or methylated N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 4). KRAS mutations were more abundant in serrated epithelial change than all other groups (P < 0.001). Subsequent dysplasia was not associated with DNA marker levels. In stools, the sensitivity of methylated bone morphogenic protein 3 as a single marker was 60% for all lesions <1 cm, 63% for low-grade dysplasia ≥1 cm and 81% for high-grade dysplasia/colorectal cancer, all at 91% specificity (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Selected DNA markers known to be present in advanced IBD neoplasia can also be detected in both tissues and stools from IBD patients with small adenomas and serrated lesions. Mutant KRAS exfoliated from serrated epithelial change lesions might raise false-positive rates. These findings have relevance to potential future applications of stool DNA testing for IBD surveillance.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdenomaAdultBiomarkers, TumorBone Morphogenetic Protein 3Case-Control StudiesColitis, UlcerativeColonic NeoplasmsCrohn DiseaseDNADNA MethylationDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleGene DosageHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMiddle AgedMutationPopulation SurveillanceProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Sensitivity and Specificity