Prosthetics and orthotics international · 2018
The impact a surgeon has on primary amputee prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey of residual lower limb quality.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sooriakumaran Sellaiah, Uden Maggie, Mulroy Sarah, Ewins David, Collins Thomas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Substantial improvements have been perceived in surgical results following major lower limb amputation, but there remains observed variation in amputation quality for patients referred for prosthetic rehabilitation from different hospitals.
OBJECTIVES: To assess various elements that influence residual limb quality and evaluate their impact on progress through initial prosthetic rehabilitation and mobility outcome after rehabilitation.
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical survey.
METHODS: A revised 10-item residual limb scoring system was used to survey a succession of 95 primary amputees with transtibial and transfemoral amputations (100 residual limbs) presenting for rehabilitation.
RESULTS: The majority of residual limbs scored highly, supporting the perception of generally good amputation quality. There were significant differences in average residual limb scores between some hospitals. The overall scores showed weak or minimal correlation to progress through rehabilitation and mobility outcome but residual limbs scoring higher in seven of the items of the score showed significant advantages in key aspects of progress or mobility at discharge.
CONCLUSION: There is need for continued collaboration between surgeons and rehabilitation centres to ensure consistent high standards. The revised residual limb score used in this survey needs further refinement for future use. Clinical relevance Residual limb quality is an important component influencing prosthetic rehabilitation. This survey of residual limbs at one Rehabilitation Centre suggests encouragingly good surgical results but highlights differences between hospitals. A particular issue is the need for effective collaboration between surgeons and prosthetic rehabilitation professionals to optimise residual limb preparation.
OBJECTIVES: To assess various elements that influence residual limb quality and evaluate their impact on progress through initial prosthetic rehabilitation and mobility outcome after rehabilitation.
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical survey.
METHODS: A revised 10-item residual limb scoring system was used to survey a succession of 95 primary amputees with transtibial and transfemoral amputations (100 residual limbs) presenting for rehabilitation.
RESULTS: The majority of residual limbs scored highly, supporting the perception of generally good amputation quality. There were significant differences in average residual limb scores between some hospitals. The overall scores showed weak or minimal correlation to progress through rehabilitation and mobility outcome but residual limbs scoring higher in seven of the items of the score showed significant advantages in key aspects of progress or mobility at discharge.
CONCLUSION: There is need for continued collaboration between surgeons and rehabilitation centres to ensure consistent high standards. The revised residual limb score used in this survey needs further refinement for future use. Clinical relevance Residual limb quality is an important component influencing prosthetic rehabilitation. This survey of residual limbs at one Rehabilitation Centre suggests encouragingly good surgical results but highlights differences between hospitals. A particular issue is the need for effective collaboration between surgeons and prosthetic rehabilitation professionals to optimise residual limb preparation.