Anticancer research · 2023
Final Results of a Study Evaluating the Course of Distress Scores During Radiotherapy for Malignant Diseases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Delikanli Cansu, Janssen Stefan, Tvilsted Søren, Yu Nathan Y, Rades Dirk
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients who receive radiotherapy (RT) may experience significant distress. This study investigated distress scores during RT for a variety of malignancies.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Distress thermometers (scores of 0-10 points) were completed by 927 patients at baseline and end of RT. Six characteristics were evaluated for changes of distress scores including age, sex, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), tumor type, intent of treatment, and previous RT.
RESULTS: Mean distress scores were 4.9 (±2.7) at baseline and 4.6 (±2.7) at the end of RT; mean change was -0.3 (±2.8) points. On univariable analysis, increased distress (≥2 points) was significantly associated with KPS 90-100 (p<0.001) and curative intent (p=0.040). Trends were found for age ≤64 years (p=0.062), head-and-neck cancer (p=0.076), and no prior RT (p=0.055). In patients with baseline scores ≤5 points, deterioration rates were 30-47%.
CONCLUSION: Psychological support should be offered to all patients undergoing RT. This would benefit particularly patients with risk factors for increased distress.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Distress thermometers (scores of 0-10 points) were completed by 927 patients at baseline and end of RT. Six characteristics were evaluated for changes of distress scores including age, sex, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), tumor type, intent of treatment, and previous RT.
RESULTS: Mean distress scores were 4.9 (±2.7) at baseline and 4.6 (±2.7) at the end of RT; mean change was -0.3 (±2.8) points. On univariable analysis, increased distress (≥2 points) was significantly associated with KPS 90-100 (p<0.001) and curative intent (p=0.040). Trends were found for age ≤64 years (p=0.062), head-and-neck cancer (p=0.076), and no prior RT (p=0.055). In patients with baseline scores ≤5 points, deterioration rates were 30-47%.
CONCLUSION: Psychological support should be offered to all patients undergoing RT. This would benefit particularly patients with risk factors for increased distress.