MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4244/eij-d-26-00158

Медицинская библиотека · EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026

Prosthesis-patient mismatch with intra-annular self-expanding valves: an analysis of the PORTICO IDE trial.

Fontana Gregory P, Waksman Ron, Salemi Arash, Cohen Marc, Abernethy William, Hermiller James, Baker Craig, Montarello Joseph, Kleiman Neal, Sondergaard Lars, Gnall Eric, Rodriguez Roberto, Gada Hemal, Brinkman William, Weissman Neil J, Mahoney Paul, Makkar Raj

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve replacement in small aortic annuli is associated with an increased risk of impaired haemodynamics.

AIMS: We sought to evaluate haemodynamic outcomes and prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) in aortic stenosis (AS) patients treated with Portico, Evolut, and SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs) in small (diameter ≤23 mm) and large (diameter >23 mm) aortic annuli.

METHODS

PORTICO IDE was a prospective, multicentre, international, premarket randomised controlled trial comparing Portico to Evolut and SAPIEN 3 TAVs. An independent core laboratory evaluated the mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) and the effective orifice area (EOA), and PPM was calculated based on the core lab results.

RESULTS

A total of 675 patients with severe AS at high or extreme surgical risk were included (Portico: 362 patients; Evolut: 109; SAPIEN 3: 204). At 30 days, the EOA and rates of severe PPM in small aortic annuli were similar between Portico and Evolut (EOA 1.65 cm2 vs 1.78 cm2; p=0.09; PPM 3.3% vs 3.0%; p=1.0) with a higher MG (8.5 mmHg vs 6.9 mmHg; p=0.034) for Portico. No significant differences were observed between Portico and Evolut for large aortic annuli (MG 8.3 mmHg vs 7.4 mmHg; p=0.069; EOA 1.93 cm2 vs 2.02 cm2; p=0.18; PPM 5.4% vs 3.2%; p=0.83). Portico was superior to SAPIEN 3 in both small (MG 8.5 mmHg vs 13.7 mmHg; p<0.0001; EOA 1.65 cm2 vs 1.40 cm2; p<0.0001; PPM 3.3% vs 26.3%; p<0.0001) and large annuli (MG 8.3 mmHg vs 10.9 mmHg; p<0.0001; EOA 1.93 cm2 vs 1.67 cm2; p<0.0001; PPM 5.4% vs 10.9%; p=0.0014). At 5 years, the rate of structural valve deterioration in patients with small aortic annuli was significantly lower in patients treated with Portico (2.2%) versus SAPIEN 3 (13.9%; p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Haemodynamic performance was similar for the intra-annular Portico and supra-annular Evolut. Portico haemodynamics outperformed the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 for PPM and mean gradient in both small and large aortic annuli.

Для цитирования: Fontana Gregory P, Waksman Ron, Salemi Arash, Cohen Marc, Abernethy William, Hermiller James, Baker Craig, Montarello Joseph, Kleiman Neal, Sondergaard Lars, Gnall Eric, Rodriguez Roberto, Gada Hemal, Brinkman William, Weissman Neil J, Mahoney Paul, Makkar Raj. Prosthesis-patient mismatch with intra-annular self-expanding valves: an analysis of the PORTICO IDE trial.. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2026. DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-26-00158.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.