The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2025
Evaluation of the Toxicity and Outcomes of the Combination of Midostaurin and CLAG-M in Patients With FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Ashley, Baek Grace, Russell Kathryn, Shaw Carole, Othus Megan, Cohen Jonathan, Palmer Shannon, Rasmussen Jack, Bubalo Joseph, Tsomo Tenzin, Schwarz Tenley, Namburi Swathi, Halpern Anna
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Addition of midostaurin to standard "7+3" (cytarabine and anthracycline) significantly prolongs overall and event-free survival. At University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (UW/FHCC), the standard regimen for newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML is cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, GCSF, and mitoxantrone (CLAG-M); midostaurin is added if FLT3-mutated. There is limited data on the use of FLT3-inhibitors with high-dose cytarabine regimens in AML.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of midostaurin with CLAG-M versus midostaurin plus 7+3 in FLT3-mutated AML patients.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicenter review including FLT3-mutated AML patients undergoing (re)induction chemotherapy with either CLAG-M or 7+3 at UW/FHCC, Oregon Health & Science University, and Swedish Cancer Institute. The primary outcome was incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included disease response per ELN2017 criteria and 28-day mortality. Excluded were patients on clinical trials or who started midostaurin 30 days after chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Eighty patients treated from September 2016 to December 2023 were included; 36 patients received CLAG-M, and 44 patients 7+3. Baseline characteristics were similar across all institutions. Adverse event rates were similar between the 2 cohorts, except diarrhea and bleeding which were more common in the 7+3 cohort. The rate of complete remission (CR) plus CR with incomplete blood count recovery did not significantly differ between the 2 cohorts: CLAG-M, 86% versus 7+3, 70% (P = 0.11).Conclusion & relevance:The toxicity profile of CLAG-M combined with midostaurin is comparable with the combination of 7+3 with midostaurin, and induces high remissions rates in adults with FLT3-mutated AML.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of midostaurin with CLAG-M versus midostaurin plus 7+3 in FLT3-mutated AML patients.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicenter review including FLT3-mutated AML patients undergoing (re)induction chemotherapy with either CLAG-M or 7+3 at UW/FHCC, Oregon Health & Science University, and Swedish Cancer Institute. The primary outcome was incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included disease response per ELN2017 criteria and 28-day mortality. Excluded were patients on clinical trials or who started midostaurin 30 days after chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Eighty patients treated from September 2016 to December 2023 were included; 36 patients received CLAG-M, and 44 patients 7+3. Baseline characteristics were similar across all institutions. Adverse event rates were similar between the 2 cohorts, except diarrhea and bleeding which were more common in the 7+3 cohort. The rate of complete remission (CR) plus CR with incomplete blood count recovery did not significantly differ between the 2 cohorts: CLAG-M, 86% versus 7+3, 70% (P = 0.11).Conclusion & relevance:The toxicity profile of CLAG-M combined with midostaurin is comparable with the combination of 7+3 with midostaurin, and induces high remissions rates in adults with FLT3-mutated AML.