MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81902-x

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of emergency medicine · 1992

Foreign body retention in glass-caused wounds.

Montano J B, Steele M T, Watson W A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To describe patient and wound characteristics that are clinically useful in identifying wounds that were caused by glass and retained a foreign body.

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case review.

SETTING

Urban, university-affiliated teaching hospital.

TYPE OF

PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred thirty consecutive patients with a total of 578 evaluable wounds caused by glass during a 12-month period.

MEASUREMENTS AND

RESULTS

Medical records were reviewed to determine patient demographics, primary wound data (eg, location, type, description), mechanism of injury, type of glass involved, and presence of foreign body sensation. Glass was found by examination in 7% of wounds. Eight percent of 137 radiographs were positive. Wounds with the highest prevalence of retained glass were puncture wounds (P < .0005), those caused by stepping on glass or by a motor vehicle accident (P < .005), and those of the head or foot (P < .003).

CONCLUSION

Characteristics of wounds most likely to retain glass were identified in this retrospective study. The presence of these factors should increase the clinician's suspicion of a retained glass foreign body. The indications for radiography for the detection of retained glass in wounds should be clarified with prospective studies.

Для цитирования: Montano J B, Steele M T, Watson W A. Foreign body retention in glass-caused wounds.. Annals of emergency medicine. 1992. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81902-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.