Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
Comparison of survival and recurrence between colonic and rectal tumors after resection in T1 colorectal cancer: long-term cohort study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Okumura Taishi, Hotta Kinichi, Imai Kenichiro, Ito Sayo, Kishida Yoshihiro, Takada Kazunori, Kawata Noboru, Yoshida Masao, Yamamoto Yoichi, Ishiwatari Hirotoshi, Sato Junya, Matsubayashi Hiroyuki, Ono Hiroyuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lesion location's impact on recurrence after T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) resection remains unclear. This study evaluated survival and recurrence differences between colonic and rectal tumors after T1 CRC resection.
METHODS: Patients who underwent T1 CRC resection were reviewed on the basis of pathologic risk factors for lymph node metastases according to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum guidelines. Participants were divided into low-risk (group A), high-risk after endoscopic resection (ER) only (group B), and high-risk after surgical resection (SR) or ER and SR (group C) groups. Survival and recurrence rates were compared between colonic and rectal tumors.
RESULTS: In 987 patients (median follow-up: 60 months), there were no significant differences in the disease-specific survival rate (A: 99.2% vs 100%, P = .582; B: 96.6% vs 100%, P = .577) or cumulative recurrence (A: 2.3% vs 0%, P = .523; B: 3.0% vs 0%, P = .399) between colonic and rectal tumors, respectively, in groups A and B. In group C, rectal lesions showed significantly higher cumulative recurrence (4.8% vs 1.1%, P = .002) and lower disease-specific survival rates (98.2% vs 99.8%, P = .024) than colonic lesions. Rectal tumor location (hazard ratio [HR], 3.25), venous invasion (HR, 9.40), and high budding grade (HR, 3.05) were independent recurrence risk factors in group C.
CONCLUSIONS: T1 rectal cancer had a worse prognosis than T1 colonic cancer after high-risk lesion SR. Careful surveillance is required for high-risk T1 rectal cancers with venous invasion or a high budding grade.
METHODS: Patients who underwent T1 CRC resection were reviewed on the basis of pathologic risk factors for lymph node metastases according to the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum guidelines. Participants were divided into low-risk (group A), high-risk after endoscopic resection (ER) only (group B), and high-risk after surgical resection (SR) or ER and SR (group C) groups. Survival and recurrence rates were compared between colonic and rectal tumors.
RESULTS: In 987 patients (median follow-up: 60 months), there were no significant differences in the disease-specific survival rate (A: 99.2% vs 100%, P = .582; B: 96.6% vs 100%, P = .577) or cumulative recurrence (A: 2.3% vs 0%, P = .523; B: 3.0% vs 0%, P = .399) between colonic and rectal tumors, respectively, in groups A and B. In group C, rectal lesions showed significantly higher cumulative recurrence (4.8% vs 1.1%, P = .002) and lower disease-specific survival rates (98.2% vs 99.8%, P = .024) than colonic lesions. Rectal tumor location (hazard ratio [HR], 3.25), venous invasion (HR, 9.40), and high budding grade (HR, 3.05) were independent recurrence risk factors in group C.
CONCLUSIONS: T1 rectal cancer had a worse prognosis than T1 colonic cancer after high-risk lesion SR. Careful surveillance is required for high-risk T1 rectal cancers with venous invasion or a high budding grade.