Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) · 1994
[Complicated colonic diverticulosis. Changes in treatment and results over 22 years].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rohr S, Thiry C L, Sadok H, de Manzini N, Hollender L F, Meyer C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical course, surgical strategy and results in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared two groups of patients who underwent surgery for complicated colonic diverticulosis from 1970 to 1984 (Group A, n = 94, mean age 60 years, 49 males, 45 females) and from 1985 to 1992 (Group B, n = 76, mean age 63.5, 32 males, 44 females).
RESULTS: Patients in the two groups were comparable; only the rate of peritonitis (20 vs 8%) was different (p < 0.05). The most frequent operations in Group A were colostomy-drainage (43%) and Hartman's procedure (26%) in emergency situations and resection with immediate anastomosis (63%) or resection-anastomosis with diverting stomy (19%) in elective cases. In Group B, surgical strategy led to a different pattern of operations, 4 and 56% in emergency, and 94 and 2% in elective surgery, respectively. Overall mortality was 11%, with 17% and 4% in Groups A and B respectively (p < 0.01). This major drop in mortality was particularly important in emergency cases (31 vs 4%; p < 0.02). Morbidity in emergency surgery fell from 21 to 4% (P < 0.0006). Interrupting the use of colostomy-drainage was a major factor in reducing mortality followed by a sharp fall in mortality after Hartmann's procedure (28.5 vs 0%).
CONCLUSION: The marked improvement in results between the two groups was mainly due to preferring resections of pathological colonic segments over colostomy-drainage.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared two groups of patients who underwent surgery for complicated colonic diverticulosis from 1970 to 1984 (Group A, n = 94, mean age 60 years, 49 males, 45 females) and from 1985 to 1992 (Group B, n = 76, mean age 63.5, 32 males, 44 females).
RESULTS: Patients in the two groups were comparable; only the rate of peritonitis (20 vs 8%) was different (p < 0.05). The most frequent operations in Group A were colostomy-drainage (43%) and Hartman's procedure (26%) in emergency situations and resection with immediate anastomosis (63%) or resection-anastomosis with diverting stomy (19%) in elective cases. In Group B, surgical strategy led to a different pattern of operations, 4 and 56% in emergency, and 94 and 2% in elective surgery, respectively. Overall mortality was 11%, with 17% and 4% in Groups A and B respectively (p < 0.01). This major drop in mortality was particularly important in emergency cases (31 vs 4%; p < 0.02). Morbidity in emergency surgery fell from 21 to 4% (P < 0.0006). Interrupting the use of colostomy-drainage was a major factor in reducing mortality followed by a sharp fall in mortality after Hartmann's procedure (28.5 vs 0%).
CONCLUSION: The marked improvement in results between the two groups was mainly due to preferring resections of pathological colonic segments over colostomy-drainage.