Cancer cytopathology · 2022
Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Zhaoyang, Zhao Huan, Guo Huiqin, An Changming
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a standard, evidence-based classification system for salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (SG-FNA). Since it was published in 2018, many researchers across the world have applied this uniform reporting system to their cohorts.
METHODS: The authors comprehensively reviewed cohort studies conducted since publication of the MSRSGC and performed a meta-analysis. The risk of neoplasm and the risk of malignancy (ROM) were calculated for each diagnostic category, and their diagnostic efficacy was evaluated.
RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of SG-FNAs was 10,706, and 7168 of those had histopathologic follow-up. The ROM for each category was: nondiagnostic, 11.4%; nonneoplastic, 10.9%; atypia of undetermined significance, 30.5%; neoplasm-benign, 2.8%; neoplasm-salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, 37.7%; suspicious for malignancy, 83.8%; and malignant, 97.7%. Low-level heterogeneity was observed in ROM estimation. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for differentiating malignant and benign lesions were 88.0%, 98.5% and 520.3, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The reporting of SG-FNA using the MSRSGC demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy. The ROM for each category was generally concordant with the recommendations, except for the suspicious for malignancy category, which was significantly higher than the reference value. The tiered, standardized classification system would benefit the clinical management of salivary gland lesions.
METHODS: The authors comprehensively reviewed cohort studies conducted since publication of the MSRSGC and performed a meta-analysis. The risk of neoplasm and the risk of malignancy (ROM) were calculated for each diagnostic category, and their diagnostic efficacy was evaluated.
RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of SG-FNAs was 10,706, and 7168 of those had histopathologic follow-up. The ROM for each category was: nondiagnostic, 11.4%; nonneoplastic, 10.9%; atypia of undetermined significance, 30.5%; neoplasm-benign, 2.8%; neoplasm-salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, 37.7%; suspicious for malignancy, 83.8%; and malignant, 97.7%. Low-level heterogeneity was observed in ROM estimation. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for differentiating malignant and benign lesions were 88.0%, 98.5% and 520.3, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The reporting of SG-FNA using the MSRSGC demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy. The ROM for each category was generally concordant with the recommendations, except for the suspicious for malignancy category, which was significantly higher than the reference value. The tiered, standardized classification system would benefit the clinical management of salivary gland lesions.