MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jama.2025.7515

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA · 2025

Clinical Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Blood Test to Screen for Colorectal Cancer.

Shaukat Aasma, Burke Carol A, Chan Andrew T, Grady William M, Gupta Samir, Katona Bryson W, Ladabaum Uri, Liang Peter S, Liu Julia J, Putcha Girish, Robertson Douglas J, Schoen Robert E, Meng Zhen, Piscitello Andrew, Sun Chung-Kai, Xu Chuanbo, Lin C Jimmy, Lee Lilian C, Baldo Lance, Levin Theodore R, PREEMPT CRC Investigators

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Colorectal cancer screening is widely recommended but underused. Blood-based screening offers the potential for higher adherence compared with endoscopy or stool-based testing but must first be clinically validated in a screening population.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical performance of an investigational blood-based circulating tumor DNA test for colorectal cancer detection in an average-risk population using colonoscopy with histopathology as the reference method.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

Prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional observational study enrolling participants between May 2020 and April 2022 who were asymptomatic adults aged 45 to 85 years, at average risk of colorectal cancer, and willing to undergo a standard-of-care screening colonoscopy. Participants, staff, and pathologists were blinded to blood test results, and laboratory testing was performed blinded to colonoscopy findings. The study was conducted at 201 centers across 49 US states and the United Arab Emirates. Site-based and mobile phlebotomy were used for blood collection.

EXPOSURES: Participants were required to complete a screening colonoscopy after blood collection.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end points were sensitivity for colorectal cancer, specificity for advanced colorectal neoplasia (colorectal cancer or advanced precancerous lesions), negative predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia, and positive predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia. The secondary end point was sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions.

RESULTS

The median age of participants in the evaluable cohort (n = 27 010) was 57.0 years, and 55.8% were women. Sensitivity for colorectal cancer was 79.2% (57/72; 95% CI, 68.4%-86.9%) and specificity for advanced colorectal neoplasia was 91.5% (22 306/24 371; 95% CI, 91.2%-91.9%). The negative predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia was 90.8% (22 306/24 567; 95% CI, 90.7%-90.9%) and the positive predictive value for advanced colorectal neoplasia was 15.5% (378/2443; 95% CI, 14.2%-16.8%). All primary end points met prespecified acceptance criteria. The sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions was 12.5% (321/2567; 95% CI, 11.3%-13.8%), which did not meet the prespecified acceptance criterion.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In an average-risk colorectal cancer screening population, a blood-based test demonstrated acceptable accuracy for colorectal cancer detection, but detection of advanced precancerous lesions remains a challenge, and ongoing efforts are needed to improve test sensitivity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04369053.

Для цитирования: Shaukat Aasma, Burke Carol A, Chan Andrew T, Grady William M, Gupta Samir, Katona Bryson W, Ladabaum Uri, Liang Peter S, Liu Julia J, Putcha Girish, Robertson Douglas J, Schoen Robert E, Meng Zhen, Piscitello Andrew, Sun Chung-Kai, Xu Chuanbo, Lin C Jimmy, Lee Lilian C, Baldo Lance, Levin Theodore R, PREEMPT CRC Investigators. Clinical Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Blood Test to Screen for Colorectal Cancer.. JAMA. 2025. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2025.7515.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.