Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2007
Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) versus cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC).
Клиническое исследование II фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rivera Fernando, Vega-Villegas M Eugenia, López-Brea Marta, Isla Dolores, Mayorga Marta, Galdós Piedad, Rubio Antonio, Del Valle Adolfo, García-Reija Fe, García-Montesinos Belen, Rodríguez-Iglesias Julio, Mayordomo Jose, Rama Julio, Saiz-Bustillo Ramón, Sanz-Ortiz Jaime
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a multicentric randomized phase II trial comparing 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) and cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC). Primary objective was complete response (CR) to IC and overall survival (OS) was a secondary objective.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PF: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. Day 1 (D1) and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) per day i.v. continous infusion D1-D5, every 21 days. UFTVP: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. D1; UFT 200 mg/m(2) per day p.o. D1-D21 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. D1 and D8, every 21 days. Four IC courses were planned in both arms.
RESULTS: A total of 206 patients (pts) were included (PF/UFTVP: 99/107): oral cavity: 8%/10%, oropharynx: 20%/25%, hypopharynx: 17%/14%, larynx: 54%/50%. Stage (TNM, 2002): III: 41%/35%, IVA: 23%/27%, IVB: 35%/38%. Complete response to IC: PF:36%/UFTVP:31% (P: no significative (NS)). G 3-4 toxicity (PF/UFTVP): neutropenia: 52%/72%; febrile neutropenia: 3%/20% (P < 0.001); anaemia:1%/14% (P < 0.001); trombocytopenia: 5%/0% (P = 0.02); mucositis: 15%/7% (P < 0.001). Deaths during IC: 2(2%)/3(3%). IC with UFTVP was associated with a favourable OS in the Cox analysis (actuarial 5 year OS: 49% vs. 34%; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95, P: 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical response is equal in both arms, overall survival (Cox) is better in the UFTVP arm. Febrile neutropenia and anaemia were more frequent with UFTVP while mucositis and trombocytopenia were more severe with PF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PF: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. Day 1 (D1) and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) per day i.v. continous infusion D1-D5, every 21 days. UFTVP: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. D1; UFT 200 mg/m(2) per day p.o. D1-D21 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. D1 and D8, every 21 days. Four IC courses were planned in both arms.
RESULTS: A total of 206 patients (pts) were included (PF/UFTVP: 99/107): oral cavity: 8%/10%, oropharynx: 20%/25%, hypopharynx: 17%/14%, larynx: 54%/50%. Stage (TNM, 2002): III: 41%/35%, IVA: 23%/27%, IVB: 35%/38%. Complete response to IC: PF:36%/UFTVP:31% (P: no significative (NS)). G 3-4 toxicity (PF/UFTVP): neutropenia: 52%/72%; febrile neutropenia: 3%/20% (P < 0.001); anaemia:1%/14% (P < 0.001); trombocytopenia: 5%/0% (P = 0.02); mucositis: 15%/7% (P < 0.001). Deaths during IC: 2(2%)/3(3%). IC with UFTVP was associated with a favourable OS in the Cox analysis (actuarial 5 year OS: 49% vs. 34%; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95, P: 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical response is equal in both arms, overall survival (Cox) is better in the UFTVP arm. Febrile neutropenia and anaemia were more frequent with UFTVP while mucositis and trombocytopenia were more severe with PF.