MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.002

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery · 2020

Review of publications on the possible advantages of a direct cheek incision for accessory parotid gland masses.

Huvenne W, De Vriese C, Bogaert J, Vermeersch H

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Lesions of the accessory parotid gland (APG) are rare and surgical management is generally under-discussed. The surgical approach should provide complete resection, while minimising complications and aesthetic complaints. The current study reviews recent publications on the surgical management of APG masses, and discusses the advantages, and limitations of, and our experience with, direct cheek incision. Papers on the surgical management of APG masses published in the last 10 years were systematically searched. Information was obtained regarding the surgical approach, type of excision, and postoperative complications. In the included studies, 253 APG masses were selected for analysis, whereof six were treated with the direct cheek incision. Although no local recurrence or postoperative complications were observed after this, the approach was usually not recommended due to a higher reported risk of recurrence and complications in older papers. More recent studies, however, indicate that the direct cheek incision should be considered as a valuable alternative to standard approaches in selected patients.

Для цитирования: Huvenne W, De Vriese C, Bogaert J, Vermeersch H. Review of publications on the possible advantages of a direct cheek incision for accessory parotid gland masses.. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.