MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.26434

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2020

Determining the number and distribution of intraparotid lymph nodes according to parotidectomy classification of European Salivary Gland Society: Cadaveric study.

Sönmez Said, Orhan Kadir Serkan, Kara Erdoğan, Büyük Melek, Aydemir Levent, Asliyüksek Hızır

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To investigate the distribution of the parotid gland's intraglandular lymph nodes using the parotidectomy zones determined by the parotidectomy classification of the European Salivary Gland Society (ESGS).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 128 parotid glands were dissected from 64 fresh cadavers, by bilateral parotidectomy without additional incision within the standard autopsy procedure, and categorized.

RESULTS

Eighty-six percent of the IGLNs were located in the superficial lobe and 14% in the deep lobe. An average of 7.09 ± 3.55 IGLNs were found for each of the gland; there were 6.11 ± 3.28 in the superficial lobe and 0.98 ± 1.46 in the deep lobe. While the most common lymph nodes were found in level 2 with 47.7%, only 5% of IGLNs were at level 4. According to the proposed modification, the most common lymph nodes (35.24%) were located at level 2B.

CONCLUSION

Level 2B was found to contain significantly more lymph nodes than other levels, which has not been evaluated before in literature.

Для цитирования: Sönmez Said, Orhan Kadir Serkan, Kara Erdoğan, Büyük Melek, Aydemir Levent, Asliyüksek Hızır. Determining the number and distribution of intraparotid lymph nodes according to parotidectomy classification of European Salivary Gland Society: Cadaveric study.. Head & neck. 2020. DOI: 10.1002/hed.26434.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.