Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2020
Intra-parotid lymph node metastasis in patients with non-cutaneous head and neck cancers: clinical and imaging features for differentiation from simultaneous parotid primary tumor.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Hye Jeong, Yoon Dae Young, Hong Ji Hyun, Yun Eun Joo, Baek Sora, Kim Eun Soo, Park Min Woo, Kwon Kee Hwan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although uncommon, intra-parotid lymph node (IPLN) metastasis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of parotid masses in patients with head and neck cancers.
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and imaging features of IPLN metastases from head and neck cancers and simultaneous parotid primary tumors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 2199 patients with non-parotid head and neck cancers revealed 63 patients who also underwent parotidectomy during curative resection of head and neck cancer. After exclusion of direct extension to the parotid gland from adjacent primary tumors (n = 12) and IPLN metastases from skin cancer (n = 5), the final study group was composed of 46 patients, including 26 (1.2%) with 33 IPLN metastases and 20 (0.9%) with 24 simultaneous parotid primary tumors. We compared clinical features of patients (sex, age, site of primary tumor, histologic type, history of prior treatment for malignancy, TNM stages, side of parotid lesion, multiplicity, and metastasis in ipsilateral cervical LNs) and the CT (location in parotid gland, maximum dimension, margins, and central necrosis or cystic change) and 18F-FDG PET/CT (maximum standardized uptake value) findings.
RESULTS: Ipsilateral level II LN metastasis was more frequent in the IPLN metastasis group than in the simultaneous parotid primary tumor group (73.1% vs. 35.0%, P < 0.05). Imaging features such as location in parotid gland, maximum dimension, margins, central necrosis or cystic change, and maximum standardized uptake value showed no significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: CT and PET/CT findings of IPLN metastasis are indistinguishable from simultaneous parotid primary tumor in patients with head and neck cancers.
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and imaging features of IPLN metastases from head and neck cancers and simultaneous parotid primary tumors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 2199 patients with non-parotid head and neck cancers revealed 63 patients who also underwent parotidectomy during curative resection of head and neck cancer. After exclusion of direct extension to the parotid gland from adjacent primary tumors (n = 12) and IPLN metastases from skin cancer (n = 5), the final study group was composed of 46 patients, including 26 (1.2%) with 33 IPLN metastases and 20 (0.9%) with 24 simultaneous parotid primary tumors. We compared clinical features of patients (sex, age, site of primary tumor, histologic type, history of prior treatment for malignancy, TNM stages, side of parotid lesion, multiplicity, and metastasis in ipsilateral cervical LNs) and the CT (location in parotid gland, maximum dimension, margins, and central necrosis or cystic change) and 18F-FDG PET/CT (maximum standardized uptake value) findings.
RESULTS: Ipsilateral level II LN metastasis was more frequent in the IPLN metastasis group than in the simultaneous parotid primary tumor group (73.1% vs. 35.0%, P < 0.05). Imaging features such as location in parotid gland, maximum dimension, margins, central necrosis or cystic change, and maximum standardized uptake value showed no significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: CT and PET/CT findings of IPLN metastasis are indistinguishable from simultaneous parotid primary tumor in patients with head and neck cancers.